No UC admissions data on file for Valley Oak High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
172 (2018)134 (2026)
-22.1%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
123 (2018)87 (2026)
-29.3%

If this trend holds (-3.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~130 -4 $0
3 yr (2029) ~122 -12 $0
5 yr (2031) ~115 -19 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Napa County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -29.3% vs. county +1.0% AND stability (39.8%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 64.7% (up +4.1 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-29.3%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+1.0%  Napa County baseline
-30.3pp  gap vs. county
39.8%  retention (county median 91.5%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
39.8%
100 of 251 students

151 of 251 students who enrolled at Valley Oak High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (60.2% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Napa County median
91.5% · school is in the 14th percentile of 7 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 12th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (225) 41.3%
Hispanic / Latino (198) 38.9%
English learners (88) 36.4%
White (36) 50.0%

Nearest peer high schools

John Finney High (continuation) 42.0% Griffin Academy High School 87.0% New Technology High School 91.3% Ernest Kimme Charter Academy 55.7%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
64.7%
154 of 238 students

Absenteeism is up 4.1 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Napa County median
16.7% · school is worse than 86% of 7 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 80
12.5%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-37.2 pts vs. Napa County median (49.7%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 80
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-19.4 pts vs. Napa County median (19.4%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 80% +4.6
White 10% -9.0
Two or more 7% +4.3
Black / African Am. 2% +1.6
Filipino 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 92% +10.0
English learners 32% +10.3

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Napa Valley Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$285.4M
+13.6% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$16,815
16,971 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 38.7%
Local: 52.1%
Federal: 9.2%
Instruction share
56.2%
of current spending · $7,168/pupil
Long-term debt
$544.4M
+27.8% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Napa Valley Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Valley Oak High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 29% (123→87 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +18%.
  • At its recent rate (-3.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~122 by 2029 — about 12 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

134 students (2026)
~122 projected (2029)
at -3.1%/yr

That's about 12 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Valley Oak High Public 134 -29%
Peer-group median 8.7% +18%
John Finney High (continuation) Public 130 -47%
Griffin Academy High School Public 168 6.9% +9%
New Technology High School Public 378 10.4% +10%
Matt Garcia Career And College Academy Public 203 +40%
Ernest Kimme Charter Academy Public 187 +102%
Creekside High Public 61 +629%
Sem Yeto Continuation High Public 302 -24%
San Antonio High (continuation) Public 60 -29%
El Camino High Public 65 +26%
Marin Oaks High Public 63 +27%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →