Livingston High School
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Delhi High School → Buhach Colony High School → Hilmar High School → Atwater High School → Hughson High School → Compare all similar →Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (-0.6%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~1,147 | -7 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~1,132 | -22 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~1,117 | -37 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Merced County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Families who enroll at Livingston High School stay (91.0% stability — elite). But enrollment is dropping faster than Merced County (school +1.2% vs. county +7.6%). The audit question isn't why students leave — it's why fewer families are choosing to enroll in the first place.
110 of 1,220 students who enrolled at Livingston High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (9.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 14.2 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
District financial profile — Merced Union High (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 20.5%
Federal: 14.9%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Merced Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
-3.4 pp vs. peer median (13.2%) · Ranked #8 of 11 similar schools
18.5%
13.2%
53.3%
9.8%
Higher than 18% of California high schools (1105 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Livingston High School's UC Reach of 9.8% is below the California median (18.5%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 53.3% or higher.
Overall, Livingston High School's UC Reach is higher than 18% of California high schools (1105 ranked).
Livingston High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · Livingston · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Livingston High School sits in the middle of its similar-school group (ranked #8 of 11): 10% vs. a peer median of 13%.
- ▸Its UC Reach has slipped 4 points since 2018 — worth watching.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 1% (257→260 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +14%.
- ▸At its recent rate (-0.6%/yr), enrollment projects to ~1132 by 2029 — about 22 fewer students than today.
Enrollment projection
That's about 22 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.
Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Livingston High School | Public | 1154 | 9.8% | +1% |
| Peer-group median | 13.2% | +14% | ||
| Delhi High School | Public | 716 | 25.3% | -15% |
| Buhach Colony High School | Public | 1670 | 5.5% | -9% |
| Hilmar High School | Public | 700 | 9.0% | +21% |
| Atwater High School | Public | 2058 | 9.8% | +27% |
| Hughson High School | Public | 902 | 12.2% | +55% |
| Orestimba High School | Public | 902 | 15.2% | +21% |
| El Capitan High | Public | 1852 | 20.0% | +10% |
| John H Pitman High School | Public | 1968 | 15.5% | +2% |
| Merced High School | Public | 1975 | 12.5% | +18% |
| Ceres High School | Public | 1580 | 14.0% | -5% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Admit rate vs. CA peer average, by campus ⓘ
How does this school's admit rate at each UC compare to other CA schools whose applicant pool averages the same GPA?
| Campus | Applicant GPA (avg) | Actual admit rate | CA peer avg | Δ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | 3.90 | 30.8% | 11.7% | +19.1pp | Over |
| UC San Diego | 3.75 | 35.3% | 26.4% | +8.9pp | Over |
| UC Santa Barbara | 3.61 | 50.0% | 29.2% | +20.8pp | Over |
| UC Irvine | 3.66 | 17.6% | 17.1% | +0.5pp | On target |
| UC Davis | 3.59 | 17.1% | 32.7% | -15.5pp | Under |
Where Livingston High School sits vs. all California schools ⓘ
Overall, this school admits its UC applicants in line with what their GPAs predict (27.1% actual vs. 23.7% expected).
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 26 | 8 | 4 | 30.8% | 2.7% | 50.0% | 3.90 | 4.18 |
| UCLA → Elite | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.73 | — |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 17 | 6 | — | 35.3% | 2.0% | — | 3.75 | 4.22 |
| UC Santa Barbara → Selective | 12 | 6 | — | 50.0% | 2.0% | — | 3.61 | 4.07 |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 17 | 3 | — | 17.6% | 1.0% | — | 3.66 | — |
| UC Davis → | 35 | 6 | — | 17.1% | 2.0% | — | 3.59 | 4.19 |