No UC admissions data on file for Linda Esperanza Marquez High B Libra Academy.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
685 (2018)614 (2026)
-10.4%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
138 (2018)146 (2026)
+5.8%

If this trend holds (-1.4%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~606 -8 $0
3 yr (2029) ~589 -25 $0
5 yr (2031) ~573 -41 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Healthy
Best in class — winning on demand and retention.

Linda Esperanza Marquez High B Libra Academy outperformed Los Angeles County on enrollment (school +5.8% vs. county -8.2%) AND maintains 93.7% stability. Replicable model — worth documenting what's working.

+5.8%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-8.2%  Los Angeles County baseline
+14.0pp  gap vs. county
93.7%  retention (county median 87.3%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
93.7%
594 of 634 students

40 of 634 students who enrolled at Linda Esperanza Marquez High B Libra Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (6.3% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Los Angeles County median
87.3% · school is in the 82nd percentile of 387 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 84th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (613) 93.6%
Socio. disadvantaged (602) 94.0%
Students w/ disabilities (62) 91.9%
English learners (47) 85.1%

Nearest peer high schools

Alliance Collins Family College-Ready High 95.2% Aspire Ollin University Preparatory Academy 93.6% Alliance Margaret M. Bloomfield Technology Academy High 86.8% Alliance Patti And Peter Neuwirth Leadership Academy 95.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
18.2%
114 of 625 students

Absenteeism is up 11.7 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Los Angeles County median
25.2% · school is better than 70% of 381 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 145
66.2%
incl. 28.3% exceeded
+8.2 pts above Los Angeles County median (58.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 144
20.1%
incl. 4.2% exceeded
-4.9 pts vs. Los Angeles County median (25.0%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 96% -1.8
White 3% +2.1

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 96% +1.6
Socioeconomically disadv. 11% +1.4
English learners 6% +4.0

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Los Angeles Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$11112.5M
+8.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$24,124
460,633 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 51.7%
Local: 29.8%
Federal: 18.5%
Instruction share
53.5%
of current spending · $10,061/pupil
Long-term debt
$11908.4M
+4.3% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Los Angeles Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Linda Esperanza Marquez High B Libra Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 6% (138→146 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -4%.
  • At its recent rate (-1.4%/yr), enrollment projects to ~589 by 2029 — about 25 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

614 students (2026)
~589 projected (2029)
at -1.4%/yr

That's about 25 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Linda Esperanza Marquez High B Libra Academy Public 614 +6%
Peer-group median 28.2% -4%
Alliance Collins Family College-Ready High Public 626 34.8% -6%
Aspire Ollin University Preparatory Academy Public 588 -44%
Alliance Margaret M. Bloomfield Technology Academy High Public 590 +20%
Nava College Prep Academy Public 585 28.2% -26%
Alliance Patti And Peter Neuwirth Leadership Academy Public 595 -6%
Aspire Pacific Academy Public 539 22.4% -22%
Alliance Judy Ivie Burton Technology Academy High Public 616 +3%
Animo Jackie Robinson High Public 607 +4%
Mervyn M Dymally High School Public 580 8.3% -2%
Synergy Quantum Academy Public 567 39.3% +44%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →