Liberty High

· San Joaquin County · Lodi Unified
Public San Joaquin County 🏛 Lodi Unified → CDS 3968585…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Plaza Robles Continuation High → Independence School → New Vision High → Estrellita Continuation High → Village Oaks High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Liberty High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
113 (2018)89 (2026)
-21.2%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
102 (2018)65 (2026)
-36.3%

If this trend holds (-2.9%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~86 -3 $0
3 yr (2029) ~81 -8 $0
5 yr (2031) ~77 -12 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Joaquin County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -36.3% vs. county +21.8% AND stability (52.9%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 72.1% (up -5.9 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-36.3%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+21.8%  San Joaquin County baseline
-58.1pp  gap vs. county
52.9%  retention (county median 85.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
52.9%
83 of 157 students

74 of 157 students who enrolled at Liberty High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (47.1% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Joaquin County median
85.8% · school is in the 18th percentile of 44 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 19th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (130) 54.6%
Hispanic / Latino (103) 56.3%
English learners (39) 61.5%
White (30) 43.3%

Nearest peer high schools

Plaza Robles Continuation High 52.5% Independence School 59.6% New Vision High 39.5% Estrellita Continuation High 18.6% Village Oaks High 70.0%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
72.1%
111 of 154 students

Absenteeism is down 5.9 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

San Joaquin County median
21.2% · school is worse than 91% of 44 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 52
15.4%
incl. 5.8% exceeded
-34.3 pts vs. San Joaquin County median (49.7%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 52
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-18.9 pts vs. San Joaquin County median (18.9%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 74% +2.5
White 14% -7.8
Asian 3% +2.6
Two or more 3% +1.8
Filipino 2%
American Indian 2%
Black / African Am. 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 83% +10.7
Socioeconomically disadv. 14%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Lodi Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$480.7M
+16.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$17,231
27,896 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 64.8%
Local: 20.9%
Federal: 14.3%
Instruction share
57.3%
of current spending · $8,708/pupil
Long-term debt
$301.1M
+39.9% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Lodi Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Liberty High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 36% (102→65 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -6%.
  • At its recent rate (-2.9%/yr), enrollment projects to ~81 by 2029 — about 8 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

89 students (2026)
~81 projected (2029)
at -2.9%/yr

That's about 8 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Liberty High Public 89 -36%
Peer-group median 4.2% -6%
Plaza Robles Continuation High Public 104 +6%
Independence School Public 140 -19%
New Vision High Public 86 -34%
Estrellita Continuation High Public 65 +117%
Village Oaks High Public 157 +7%
Nathaniel S. Colley Sr. High Public 89 +25%
Jane Frederick High Public 183 -10%
Rio Valley Charter School Public 305 -19%
Valley Robotics Academy Public 288 -48%
Vista Oaks Charter School Public 307 4.2% -3%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →