Laytonville High School

Laytonville · Mendocino County · Laytonville Unified
Public Mendocino County 🏛 Laytonville Unified → ~26 seniors CDS 2373916…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Round Valley High School → Willits Charter → Three Rivers Charter → La Vida Charter → Geyserville New Tech Academy → Compare all similar →

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
108 (2018)96 (2026)
-11.1%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
30 (2018)28 (2026)
-6.7%

If this trend holds (-1.5%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~95 -1 $0
3 yr (2029) ~92 -4 $0
5 yr (2031) ~89 -7 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Mendocino County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Action needed
Demand declining faster than county; retention only average.

Enrollment is shrinking faster than Mendocino County (school -6.7% vs. county +0.3%) with stability (91.3%) near the county median. Two problems compounding — the recruitment side is the higher-leverage starting point. Chronic absenteeism is also at 38.2% (up +12.4 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-6.7%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+0.3%  Mendocino County baseline
-7.0pp  gap vs. county
91.3%  retention (county median 90.7%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
91.3%
95 of 104 students

9 of 104 students who enrolled at Laytonville High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (8.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Mendocino County median
90.7% · school is in the 60th percentile of 10 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 73rd percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (81) 90.1%
White (54) 94.4%

Nearest peer high schools

Round Valley High School 73.8% Willits Charter 76.8% Three Rivers Charter 83.3% La Vida Charter 58.1% Geyserville New Tech Academy 88.1%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
38.2%
39 of 102 students

Absenteeism is up 12.4 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Mendocino County median
36.4% · school is worse than 50% of 10 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 28
60.7%
incl. 28.6% exceeded
+25.3 pts above Mendocino County median (35.4%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 28
32.1%
incl. 10.7% exceeded
+18.6 pts above Mendocino County median (13.5%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

White 52% -1.4
Hispanic / Latino 18%
Two or more 15% -3.6
American Indian 12% +4.4
Asian 2%
Filipino 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 69%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Laytonville Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$9.1M
+37.2% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$25,205
360 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 47.6%
Local: 41.6%
Federal: 10.8%
Instruction share
45.7%
of current spending · $8,019/pupil
Long-term debt
$7.1M
-9.4% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Laytonville Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

University of California outcomes · Class of 2024
UC Reach
N/A
UC Application Reach
N/A
None applications
UC Admit Rate
N/A
None / None applications
UC Yield Rate
N/A
None enrolled of None admitted
Yield vs. Enrollment Reach: Yield answers "of UC admits, what % chose UC?" — denominator is just the admits. A small admitted cohort can post a low yield even when the school sends a healthy share of its class to UC.
UC Enrollment Reach
N/A
None enrollees / 26 seniors
Enrollment Reach vs. Yield: Reach answers "of the whole senior class, what % ended up at UC?" — denominator is everyone. High Yield with low Enrollment Reach is common at elite privates: most admits matriculate, but the school sends most of its class to non-UC selective colleges.
Student-Counselor Ratio
107:1
0.9 FTE counselors · 96 students
In context: CA median 338:1 · 231 fewer students per counselor · ASCA target 250:1.
A-G Completion
11%
3 of 27 graduates · 2022-23 cohort
In context: CA median 54.1% · -43.0 pp vs. median · Mendocino Co. 31.3%.
Selective UC Reach (UCSD, UCSB, UCI, UCD)
N/A
Elite UC Reach (UCB + UCLA)
N/A
Senior Class Size
26
CDE grade 12 (exact)
Total School Enrollment
99
All grades · CDE Census Day
Economic Connectedness
0.63
13th percentile in CA · cross‑class friendships

Laytonville High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · Laytonville · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 7% (30→28 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +13%.
  • At its recent rate (-1.5%/yr), enrollment projects to ~92 by 2029 — about 4 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

96 students (2026)
~92 projected (2029)
at -1.5%/yr

That's about 4 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Laytonville High School Public 96 -7%
Peer-group median 13.1% +13%
Round Valley High School Public 110 13.6% +5%
Willits Charter Public 131 -29%
Three Rivers Charter Public 78 +50%
La Vida Charter Public 60 -17%
Geyserville New Tech Academy Public 97 -39%
Carle (william C.) High (continuation) Public 99 +24%
Hayfork High School Public 90 12.5% +38%
Potter Valley High School Public 70 +43%
Salisbury High (continuation) Public 104 +21%
Agnes J. Johnson Charter Public 79 +0%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Avg. Applicant GPA · top-6 UCs
3.84

GPA figures reflect 2022 — UC has not yet released applicant/admit GPA for 2024.

Campus Breakdown — 2024

Campus Applicants Admits Enrollees Admit Rate UC Reach Yield Avg GPA (App) '22 Avg GPA (Adm) '22
UC Berkeley → Elite
UCLA → Elite
UC San Diego → Selective 3.85
UC Santa Barbara → Selective 3.82
UC Irvine → Selective
UC Davis →
⚠ Campus-level totals may count one student admitted to multiple UC campuses more than once. Admit Volume metrics are not the same as UC Reach, which requires unique-student counts. See methodology →

What This Means

Note: admit counts used here are campus-level totals. A student admitted to both UCLA and UCSD is counted twice. When UCOP unique-student data becomes available it will be loaded automatically and the labels will update.
Compare with other schools → See Mendocino County rankings →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →