Highlands Academy

· Lake County · Konocti Unified
Public Lake County 🏛 Konocti Unified → CDS 1764022…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Loconoma Valley High → Konocti Education Center Schl → Clover Valley High (continuation) → Johanna Echols-Hansen High (continuation) → Natural High (continuation) → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Highlands Academy.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
27 (2018)16 (2026)
-40.7%

If this trend holds (-6.3%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~15 -1 $0
3 yr (2029) ~13 -3 $0
5 yr (2031) ~12 -4 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Lake County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
39.3%
11 of 28 students

17 of 28 students who enrolled at Highlands Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (60.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Lake County median
82.6% · school is in the 17th percentile of 6 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 7th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (27) 37.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Loconoma Valley High 17.4% Clover Valley High (continuation) 36.0% Johanna Echols-Hansen High (continuation) 46.4% Natural High (continuation) 45.0%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
100.0%
23 of 23 students

Absenteeism is up 25.7 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Lake County median
36.2% · school is worse than 100% of 6 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Konocti Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$62.6M
+31.5% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$17,386
3,603 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 64.1%
Local: 20.4%
Federal: 15.5%
Instruction share
50.3%
of current spending · $7,422/pupil
Long-term debt
$40.8M
+55.4% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Konocti Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Highlands Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-6.3%/yr), enrollment projects to ~13 by 2029 — about 3 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

16 students (2026)
~13 projected (2029)
at -6.3%/yr

That's about 3 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Highlands Academy Public 16
Peer-group median +15%
Loconoma Valley High Public 14 -20%
Konocti Education Center Schl Public
Clover Valley High (continuation) Public 16 -29%
Johanna Echols-Hansen High (continuation) Public 20 +7%
Natural High (continuation) Public 24 +56%
Marce Becerra Academy Public 21 +36%
Carle (william C.) High (continuation) Public 99 +24%
Buena Vista High Public 6 +100%
North Bay Met Academy Public 28 -76%
Calistoga High School Public

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →