Esperanza High (continuation)

· Butte County · Gridley Unified
Public Butte County 🏛 Gridley Unified → CDS 0475507…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Valley Oak Continuation High → Butte View High → Feather River Academy → Colusa Alternative High (continuation) → Willows Community High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Esperanza High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
35 (2018)20 (2026)
-42.9%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
19 (2018)12 (2026)
-36.8%

If this trend holds (-6.8%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~19 -1 $0
3 yr (2029) ~16 -4 $0
5 yr (2031) ~14 -6 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Butte County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -36.8% vs. county +19.8% AND stability (18.9%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 69.7% (up -15.3 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-36.8%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+19.8%  Butte County baseline
-56.6pp  gap vs. county
18.9%  retention (county median 81.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
18.9%
7 of 37 students

30 of 37 students who enrolled at Esperanza High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (81.1% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Butte County median
81.8% · school is in the 0th percentile of 13 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 2nd percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (33) 18.2%
Hispanic / Latino (24) 20.8%

Nearest peer high schools

Valley Oak Continuation High 43.3% Butte View High 69.0% Feather River Academy 26.9% Colusa Alternative High (continuation) 20.0% Willows Community High 34.5%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
69.7%
23 of 33 students

Absenteeism is down 15.3 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Butte County median
25.9% · school is worse than 85% of 13 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 12
16.7%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-33.3 pts vs. Butte County median (50.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 11
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-28.0 pts vs. Butte County median (28.0%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 55% -16.4
White 40% +15.0
Two or more 5%

Program subgroups

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Gridley Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$37.8M
+48.8% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$18,184
2,080 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 70.1%
Local: 17.0%
Federal: 12.9%
Instruction share
58.2%
of current spending · $8,227/pupil
Long-term debt
$2.4M
-2.3% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Gridley Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Esperanza High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 37% (19→12 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +22%.
  • At its recent rate (-6.8%/yr), enrollment projects to ~16 by 2029 — about 4 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

20 students (2026)
~16 projected (2029)
at -6.8%/yr

That's about 4 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Esperanza High (continuation) Public 20 -37%
Peer-group median +22%
Valley Oak Continuation High Public 17 +25%
Butte View High Public 19 +11%
Feather River Academy Public 26 -70%
Colusa Alternative High (continuation) Public 24 +86%
Willows Community High Public 17 +57%
Academy For Change Public 25 +300%
Princeton High Public 44 -35%
Oroville High Community Day Public 6 -50%
Ipakanni Early College Charter Public 66 +50%
S. William Abel Academy Public 39 +20%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →