No UC admissions data on file for Covina-Valley Learning Options Academy.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Covina-Valley Learning Options Academy
· Los Angeles County · Covina-Valley Unified · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Mt. Olive Innovation And Technology High → Chaparral High (continuation) → Arrow High (continuation) → Whitcomb Continuation High → Fairvalley High (continuation) → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- Program details not reported to CRDC
- Academic signals not yet ingested for this school
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How Covina-Valley Learning Options Academy compares for families
What families should know about Covina-Valley Learning Options Academy.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Mt. Olive Innovation And Technology High, Chaparral High (continuation), Arrow High (continuation) and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.
For Parents
Follow Covina-Valley Learning Options Academy
Get an email when Covina-Valley Learning Options Academy's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.
🏛️ Federal Title I context
High-poverty school
Title I Schoolwide eligible
≥75% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. These schools qualify for the highest tier of federal Title I funding and typically receive extra wraparound services. Academic outcomes vary widely — check the state assessment + grad-rate tiles.
Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2023
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is down 26.1 pp since 2021-22. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (-30.4%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~42 | -19 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~21 | -40 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~10 | -51 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Covina-Valley Learning Options Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 1100% (1→12 from 2022 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -26%.
- ▸At its recent rate (-30.4%/yr), enrollment projects to ~21 by 2029 — about 40 fewer students than today.
Enrollment projection
That's about 40 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.
Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covina-Valley Learning Options Academy | Public | 61 | — | +1100% |
| Peer-group median | — | -26% | ||
| Mt. Olive Innovation And Technology High | Public | 55 | — | -56% |
| Chaparral High (continuation) | Public | 58 | — | -24% |
| Arrow High (continuation) | Public | 49 | — | -36% |
| Whitcomb Continuation High | Public | 85 | — | +60% |
| Fairvalley High (continuation) | Public | 101 | — | -18% |
| Nueva Vista Continuation High | Public | 45 | — | +18% |
| Santana High (continuation) | Public | 79 | — | -51% |
| Valley Alternative High (continuation) | Public | 75 | — | -29% |
| Ron Hockwalt Academies (continuation) | Public | 44 | — | +236% |
| Sierra High | Public | 122 | — | -39% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment growth is beating Los Angeles County (+1100.0% vs. -11.2%), but 18 of 43 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled?
18 of 43 students who enrolled at Covina-Valley Learning Options Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (41.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Covina-Valley Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 17.6%
Federal: 19.9%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Covina-Valley Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
For School Admins
The full Reach Report for Covina-Valley Learning Options Academy
A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.
- ✓Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently -30.4%/yr) with the revenue at stake
- ✓Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals