Clayton Valley Charter High
· Contra Costa County · Contra Costa County Office of Education · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
College Park High School → Monte Vista High School → San Ramon Valley High School → Northgate High School → Heritage High School → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- Program details not reported to CRDC
- Academic signals not yet ingested for this school
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
🎓 Where grads go
UC admits by campus · Class of 2025
Source: University of California Office of the President, Admissions by Source School. Full campus-by-campus breakdown below.
How Clayton Valley Charter High compares for families
Above-average college outcomes statewide.
- ▸ Statewide25.6% UC Reach — 7.5 points above the California median of 18.1%. Ahead of 67% of California high schools.
- ▸ Locally🎯 Top 5% in California on Attendance (lowest chronic absenteeism) — plus 1 more top-rank.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsTrails the peer median (25.6% UC Reach vs 29.8% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.
For Parents
Follow Clayton Valley Charter High
Get an email when Clayton Valley Charter High's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.
🏛️ Your state's public flagship
University of California-Berkeley
The in-state tuition gap is the flagship's biggest draw — most in-state families pay far less than the out-of-state sticker. Average net price after aid runs about $13,481/yr. Admission odds depend on your student's GPA and test scores, not which high school they attend.
Source: IPEDS admissions, tuition & enrollment + College Scorecard net price. Flagship = the state's primary public research university.
Clayton Valley Charter High sent 709 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 21.0% were admitted, producing a UC Reach of 25.6% — 7.5 percentage points above the California median of 18.1%, higher than 67% of California high schools. The school produces 3.4 UCLA + UC Berkeley admits per 100 seniors.
-4.2 pp vs. peer median (29.8%) · Ranked #7 of 10 similar schools
18.1%
29.8%
51.2%
25.6%
Higher than 67% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Clayton Valley Charter High's UC Reach of 25.6% is above the California median (18.1%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 51.2% or higher.
For context, the elite tier (top 1%) clears 97.3% — a gap of 72 pp from where this school sits.
Overall, Clayton Valley Charter High's UC Reach is higher than 67% of California high schools (978 ranked).
UC funnel — which kids are getting in at what GPA
Combining the school's applicant pool GPA, admit pool GPA, actual admit rate, and statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, we can read which GPA tiers tend to get in — and which don't.
| Campus | 4.00+ GPA | 3.70–3.99 GPA | 3.30–3.69 GPA | < 3.30 GPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out | Filtered out |
| UCLA | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out | Filtered out |
| UC San Diego | Strong shot | Moderate | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Santa Barbara | Strong shot | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Irvine | Strong shot | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Davis | Strong shot | Strong shot | Real shot | Filtered out |
The numbers behind it
| Campus | Applicant GPA | Admit GPA | Lift ⓘ | Admit rate | vs peer schools @ same GPA ⓘ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | 4.00 | 4.23 | +0.23 | 8.7% | Peers +0.22 · matches |
| UCLA | 4.03 | 4.28 | +0.25 | 7.8% | Peers +0.25 · matches |
| UC San Diego | 4.00 | 4.28 | +0.27 | 18.9% | Peers +0.26 · matches |
| UC Santa Barbara | 3.99 | 4.23 | +0.24 | 33.9% | Peers +0.27 · matches |
| UC Irvine | 4.00 | 4.25 | +0.25 | 29.7% | Peers +0.22 · matches |
| UC Davis | 3.94 | 4.21 | +0.27 | 27.8% | Peers +0.23 · steeper |
📊 Statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, 2025 (for reference)
| GPA band | UCB | UCLA | UCSD | UCSB | UCI | UCD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.00+ | 17.0% | 15.1% | 45.2% | 62.3% | 46.3% | 65.9% |
| 3.70–3.99 | 3.1% | 1.6% | 9.3% | 17.6% | 17.0% | 31.1% |
| 3.30–3.69 | 0.8% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 10.3% |
| 3.00–3.29 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| < 3.00 | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.7% |
Where Clayton Valley Charter High sits vs. all California schools ⓘ
Overall, this school admits its UC applicants in line with what their GPAs predict (21.0% actual vs. 22.0% expected).
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 127 | 11 | 7 | 8.7% | 1.9% | 63.6% | 4.00 | 4.23 |
| UCLA → Elite | 116 | 9 | 6 | 7.8% | 1.5% | 66.7% | 4.03 | 4.28 |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 111 | 21 | —† | 18.9% | 3.6% | — | 4.00 | 4.28 |
| UC Santa Barbara → Selective | 112 | 38 | 6 | 33.9% | 6.5% | 15.8% | 3.99 | 4.23 |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 128 | 38 | 10 | 29.7% | 6.5% | 26.3% | 4.00 | 4.25 |
| UC Davis → | 115 | 32 | 15 | 27.8% | 5.5% | 46.9% | 3.94 | 4.21 |
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is down 7.4 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+1.0%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~2,392 | +24 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~2,440 | +72 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~2,489 | +121 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Clayton Valley Charter High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Clayton Valley Charter High sits in the middle of its similar-school group (ranked #7 of 10): 26% vs. a peer median of 30%.
- ▸Its UC Reach has risen 6 points since 2018.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 24% (446→551 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of +3%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+1.0%/yr); projects to ~2440 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton Valley Charter High | Public | 2368 | 25.6% | +24% |
| Peer-group median | 29.8% | +3% | ||
| College Park High School | Public | 1953 | 29.8% | -4% |
| Monte Vista High School | Public | 1999 | 47.1% | -7% |
| San Ramon Valley High School | Public | 2128 | 26.5% | +10% |
| Northgate High School | Public | 1578 | 41.4% | -14% |
| Heritage High School | Public | 2629 | 14.2% | +3% |
| Freedom High School | Public | 2439 | 11.1% | -6% |
| Pittsburg High School | Public | 3485 | 15.3% | +20% |
| Dublin High School | Public | 2365 | 53.5% | +62% |
| Mt. Diablo High | Public | 1389 | — | +3% |
| Las Lomas High School | Public | 1509 | 44.1% | +2% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Contra Costa County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Clayton Valley Charter High outperformed Contra Costa County on enrollment (school +23.5% vs. county -3.2%) AND maintains 94.8% stability. Replicable model — worth documenting what's working.
125 of 2,426 students who enrolled at Clayton Valley Charter High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (5.2% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Contra Costa County Office of Education (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 60.2%
Federal: 8.1%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Contra Costa County Office of Education as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
What This Means
For School Admins
The full Reach Report for Clayton Valley Charter High
A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.
- ✓Your UC Reach (25.6%) ranked head-to-head against your closest competitor schools
- ✓Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 1.0%/yr) with the revenue at stake
- ✓Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals