No UC admissions data on file for California Pacific Charter- Los Angeles.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
California Pacific Charter- Los Angeles
· Los Angeles County · Acton-Agua Dulce Unified · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Middle College High → Ednovate - Legacy College Prep. → Magnolia Science Academy Santa Ana → Advanced Learning Academy → Cesar E. Chavez High → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- Program details not reported to CRDC
- Academic signals not yet ingested for this school
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How California Pacific Charter- Los Angeles compares for families
What families should know about California Pacific Charter- Los Angeles.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Middle College High, Ednovate - Legacy College Prep., Magnolia Science Academy Santa Ana and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.
For Parents
Follow California Pacific Charter- Los Angeles
Get an email when California Pacific Charter- Los Angeles's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.
🏛️ Your state's public flagship
University of California-Berkeley
The in-state tuition gap is the flagship's biggest draw — most in-state families pay far less than the out-of-state sticker. Average net price after aid runs about $13,481/yr. Admission odds depend on your student's GPA and test scores, not which high school they attend.
Source: IPEDS admissions, tuition & enrollment + College Scorecard net price. Flagship = the state's primary public research university.
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is down 16.0 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (-17.0%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~381 | -78 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~263 | -196 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~181 | -278 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
California Pacific Charter- Los Angeles — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is down 56% (118→52 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +5%.
- ▸At its recent rate (-17.0%/yr), enrollment projects to ~263 by 2029 — about 196 fewer students than today.
Enrollment projection
That's about 196 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.
Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California Pacific Charter- Los Angeles | Public | 459 | — | -56% |
| Peer-group median | 48.8% | +5% | ||
| Middle College High | Public | 476 | 79.8% | +20% |
| Ednovate - Legacy College Prep. | Public | 451 | — | +20% |
| Magnolia Science Academy Santa Ana | Public | 586 | 100.0% | +257% |
| Advanced Learning Academy | Public | 368 | 17.9% | +257% |
| Cesar E. Chavez High | Public | 309 | — | +0% |
| Lorin Griset Academy | Public | 285 | — | -20% |
| Nova Academy Early College Hs | Public | 293 | 11.1% | +10% |
| Gilbert High (continuation) | Public | 348 | — | -49% |
| Vista Meridian Global Academy | Public | 247 | — | -16% |
| Valley Vista High | Public | 250 | — | -6% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment -55.9% vs. county -8.2% AND stability (70.9%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem.
72 of 247 students who enrolled at California Pacific Charter- Los Angeles this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (29.1% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Acton-Agua Dulce Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 42.0%
Federal: 9.0%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
For School Admins
The full Reach Report for California Pacific Charter- Los Angeles
A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.
- ✓Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently -17.0%/yr) with the revenue at stake
- ✓Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals