Audeo Valley Charter School

Moreno Valley · Riverside County
Public Riverside County ~44 seniors CDS 3310330…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Orangewood High (continuation) → Leadership Military Academy → March Mountain High School → Perris Lake High (continuation) → Dr. John H. Milor High Continuation → Compare all similar →

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
191 (2024)192 (2026)
+0.5%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
44 (2024)23 (2026)
-47.7%

If this trend holds (+0.3%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~193 +1 $0
3 yr (2029) ~194 +2 $0
5 yr (2031) ~195 +3 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Riverside County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -47.7% vs. county -6.9% AND stability (53.7%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem.

-47.7%  school enrollment (2024–2026)
-6.9%  Riverside County baseline
-40.8pp  gap vs. county
53.7%  retention (county median 85.4%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2024
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
53.7%
161 of 300 students

139 of 300 students who enrolled at Audeo Valley Charter School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (46.3% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Riverside County median
85.4% · school is in the 26th percentile of 94 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 19th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (289) 60.2%
Hispanic / Latino (231) 63.6%
Students w/ disabilities (74) 70.3%
White (69) 46.4%
Black / African Am. (64) 43.8%
English learners (46) 67.4%

Nearest peer high schools

Orangewood High (continuation) 38.3% Leadership Military Academy 60.3% March Mountain High School 49.1% Perris Lake High (continuation) 29.4% Dr. John H. Milor High Continuation 33.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
16.7%
39 of 234 students

Absenteeism is down 7.6 pp since 2021-22. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Riverside County median
28.9% · school is better than 84% of 94 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 21
81.0%
incl. 23.8% exceeded
★ Top 10% CA
+31.2 pts above Riverside County median (49.7%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 21
14.3%
incl. 4.8% exceeded
-1.4 pts vs. Riverside County median (15.7%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 62% -6.1
Black / African Am. 19% +4.7
White 12% +4.6
Asian 3% +1.0
Two or more 2% -3.7
Filipino 1% -1.1
Pacific Islander 0%
American Indian 0%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 75% +2.2
Socioeconomically disadv. 16% +8.8
English learners 6%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

University of California outcomes · Class of 2024
UC Reach
N/A
UC Application Reach
N/A
None applications
UC Admit Rate
N/A
None / None applications
UC Yield Rate
N/A
None enrolled of None admitted
Yield vs. Enrollment Reach: Yield answers "of UC admits, what % chose UC?" — denominator is just the admits. A small admitted cohort can post a low yield even when the school sends a healthy share of its class to UC.
UC Enrollment Reach
N/A
None enrollees / 44 seniors
Enrollment Reach vs. Yield: Reach answers "of the whole senior class, what % ended up at UC?" — denominator is everyone. High Yield with low Enrollment Reach is common at elite privates: most admits matriculate, but the school sends most of its class to non-UC selective colleges.
A-G Completion
23%
11 of 48 graduates · 2024-25 cohort
In context: CA median 55.9% · -33.0 pp vs. median.
Selective UC Reach (UCSD, UCSB, UCI, UCD)
N/A
Elite UC Reach (UCB + UCLA)
N/A
Senior Class Size
44
CDE grade 12 (exact)
Total School Enrollment
191
All grades · CDE Census Day

Audeo Valley Charter School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · Moreno Valley · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 48% (44→23 from 2024 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -5%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+0.3%/yr); projects to ~194 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

192 students (2026)
~194 projected (2029)
at +0.3%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Audeo Valley Charter School Public 192 -48%
Peer-group median 10.3% -5%
Orangewood High (continuation) Public 205 -10%
Leadership Military Academy Public 134 -40%
March Mountain High School Public 286 +9%
Perris Lake High (continuation) Public 171 -23%
Dr. John H. Milor High Continuation Public 192 -11%
Grove High School Public 270 10.3% +48%
Nueva Vista Continuation High Public 210 +1%
Slover Mountain High (continuation) Public 223 -22%
Glen View High Public 148 +26%
Mountain View High Public 216 +0%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Campus Breakdown — 2024

Campus Applicants Admits Enrollees Admit Rate UC Reach Yield Avg GPA (App) Avg GPA (Adm)
UC Berkeley → Elite
UCLA → Elite
UC San Diego → Selective
UC Irvine → Selective
⚠ Campus-level totals may count one student admitted to multiple UC campuses more than once. Admit Volume metrics are not the same as UC Reach, which requires unique-student counts. See methodology →

What This Means

Note: admit counts used here are campus-level totals. A student admitted to both UCLA and UCSD is counted twice. When UCOP unique-student data becomes available it will be loaded automatically and the labels will update.
Compare with other schools → See Riverside County rankings →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →