Ardis G. Egan Junior High
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Georgina P. Blach Junior High → Aspire East Palo Alto Charter → Kipp Valiant Community Prep → Summit Preparatory Charter High → Los Robles-Ronald Mcnair Academy → Compare all similar →No UC admissions data on file for Ardis G. Egan Junior High.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (-3.9%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~429 | -17 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~396 | -50 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~366 | -80 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Santa Clara County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
15 of 526 students who enrolled at Ardis G. Egan Junior High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (2.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.
Absenteeism is up 4.3 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Ardis G. Egan Junior High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸At its recent rate (-3.9%/yr), enrollment projects to ~396 by 2029 — about 50 fewer students than today.
Enrollment projection
That's about 50 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.
Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ardis G. Egan Junior High | Public | 446 | — | — |
| Peer-group median | 8.3% | -16% | ||
| Georgina P. Blach Junior High | Public | 423 | — | — |
| Aspire East Palo Alto Charter | Public | 449 | — | -46% |
| Kipp Valiant Community Prep | Public | 539 | — | — |
| Summit Preparatory Charter High | Public | 380 | — | +38% |
| Los Robles-Ronald Mcnair Academy | Public | 305 | — | — |
| North Star Academy | Public | 553 | — | — |
| Discovery Charter | Public | 556 | — | — |
| Circle of Independent Learning | Public | 384 | 8.3% | -16% |
| San Carlos Charter Learning Center | Public | 367 | — | — |
| Kipp Excelencia Community Preparatory | Public | 704 | — | — |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →