No UC admissions data on file for Anderson W. Clark Magnet High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Anderson W. Clark Magnet High

· Los Angeles County · Glendale Unified · Public

Public Los Angeles County 🏛 Glendale Unified → CDS 1964568…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

📚AP rigor: Top 3.7% nationally 📖19 AP courses 🎓97% 4-yr grad rate 📘Top 5% ELA proficiency in CA 🧮Top 5% Math proficiency in CA 🎯Top 10% Attendance (lowest chronic absenteeism) in CA +3 more

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
  • 📚 19 AP courses offered — Elite
  • ✅ Dual-enrollment program (college credit while in HS)
  • ✅ Gifted & talented program
  • 🔢 3 calculus classes · 12 physics · 8 chemistry
Academic signals
  • 🎓 AP rigor: Top 3.7% of US high schools
  • 📝 SAT/ACT participation: Bottom 14% by test-taker volume
  • 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 97% (90th percentile nationally)

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

💡

How Anderson W. Clark Magnet High compares for families

Among the nation's most academically rigorous high schools.

  • StatewideAP rigor sits in the top 3.7% of US high schools with 19 AP courses.
  • Locally📘 Top 5% in California on ELA proficiency — plus 5 more top-ranks.
  • vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Verdugo Hills High School, John Muir High School, Benjamin Franklin High School and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.

🎓 Academic rigor

AP + advanced-course offerings

Elite — exceptional AP + advanced course breadth

Top 3.7% of US high schools

50th 90th ↑ this school
Less rigorMore rigorMost rigor
AP courses offered
19
Math ✓ · Science ✓
Advanced math classes
12
3 calculus · 9 advanced
Lab science classes
20
12 physics · 8 chemistry
Other rigor signals
✅ Dual-enrollment program
✅ Gifted/talented program

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). CRDC reports what's offered + enrolled — it doesn't collect AP exam pass rates (College Board owns that data and doesn't release it school-level).

SAT / ACT participation

CRDC federal data · 2020-21

Bottom 14% by test-taker volume

50th 90th
SAT/ACT test-takers
10
11th-12th graders who took 1+ college admissions test
Test-taking intensity
0.9
takers per 100 students in grades 9-12
Compared against
18,426
US high schools reporting SAT/ACT participation

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.

🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts

What % of students graduate on time?

90th percentile nationally

50th 90th
4-year graduation rate
97%
Single-point estimate
4-year cohort size
251
Students in the 9th-grade entry class tracked over 4 years
Compared against
17,988
US high schools reporting 4-year ACGR

Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.

🏛️ Federal Title I context

Title I Schoolwide eligible

≥40% FRPL — qualifies for Title I Schoolwide program

46.7%
FRPL rate — % of students who qualify for the federal Free or Reduced-Price Lunch program. This is the underlying federal income-eligibility signal Title I designations are computed from (ESEA Sec. 1113).
0% (no FRPL) 35% TA · 40% Schoolwide 100% (universal FRPL)

40-74% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. The district can use Title I funds across the whole school under federal Schoolwide Program rules.

Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 258
83.7%
incl. 50.8% exceeded
★ Top 10% CA
+25.7 pts above Los Angeles County median (58.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 254
73.2%
incl. 42.5% exceeded
★ Top 10% CA
+48.2 pts above Los Angeles County median (25.0%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

White 88% +3.7
Hispanic / Latino 5%
Asian 3% -2.2
Filipino 3%
Two or more 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 73% +20.7

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
6.1%
69 of 1,136 students

Absenteeism is up 3.8 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Los Angeles County median
25.2% · school is better than 97% of 381 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
1,122 (2018)1,152 (2026)
+2.7%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
275 (2018)254 (2026)
-7.6%

If this trend holds (+0.3%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~1,156 +4 $0
3 yr (2029) ~1,163 +11 $0
5 yr (2031) ~1,171 +19 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Anderson W. Clark Magnet High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 8% (275→254 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -2%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+0.3%/yr); projects to ~1163 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

1152 students (2026)
~1163 projected (2029)
at +0.3%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Anderson W. Clark Magnet High Public 1152 -8%
Peer-group median 23.3% -2%
Verdugo Hills High School Public 1153 17.2% -2%
John Muir High School Public 1282 17.5% +50%
Benjamin Franklin High School Public 1182 21.2% +2%
Pasadena High School Public 1197 27.1% -20%
Herbert Hoover High Public 1584 13.9% -3%
Panorama High School Public 1198 32.7% +13%
Arleta High School Public 998 11.9% -25%
Blair High School Public 951 25.4% +4%
Hollywood High School Public 980 31.1% -26%
San Marino High School Public 961 72.2% -27%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Healthy
Holding share of a shrinking market.

Anderson W. Clark Magnet High's enrollment is tracking Los Angeles County's baseline (-7.6% vs. -8.2%), and 97.7% stability is elite. The demographic tide is the headwind; you're holding your share.

-7.6%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-8.2%  Los Angeles County baseline
+0.6pp  gap vs. county
97.7%  retention (county median 87.3%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
97.7%
1,117 of 1,143 students

26 of 1,143 students who enrolled at Anderson W. Clark Magnet High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (2.3% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Los Angeles County median
87.3% · school is in the 98th percentile of 387 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 98th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

White (979) 97.4%
Socio. disadvantaged (812) 98.0%
Hispanic / Latino (63) 98.4%
Asian (48) 100.0%
Filipino (34) 100.0%
Students w/ disabilities (25) 96.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Verdugo Hills High School 83.6% John Muir High School 90.8% Benjamin Franklin High School 86.6% Pasadena High School 89.9% Herbert Hoover High 88.7%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — Glendale Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$401.8M
+17.7% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$16,119
24,924 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 51.3%
Local: 32.9%
Federal: 15.8%
Instruction share
61.8%
of current spending · $9,096/pupil
Long-term debt
$327.8M
-8.9% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Glendale Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Researching colleges for your kid at Anderson W. Clark Magnet High?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For school leaders looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →