Sonoma Mountain High (continuation)
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Valley Oaks High (alternative) → Carpe Diem High (continuation) → San Antonio High (continuation) → San Andreas High (continuation) → Creekside High → Compare all similar →No UC admissions data on file for Sonoma Mountain High (continuation).
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+4.6%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~31 | +1 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~34 | +4 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~37 | +7 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Sonoma County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment -37.5% vs. county -0.1% AND stability (31.6%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 71.0% (up -29.0 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.
26 of 38 students who enrolled at Sonoma Mountain High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (68.4% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is down 29.0 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2022
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Sonoma Mountain High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is down 38% (8→5 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -30%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+4.6%/yr); projects to ~34 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonoma Mountain High (continuation) | Public | 30 | — | -38% |
| Peer-group median | — | -30% | ||
| Valley Oaks High (alternative) | Public | 30 | — | -61% |
| Carpe Diem High (continuation) | Public | 19 | — | -50% |
| San Antonio High (continuation) | Public | 60 | — | -29% |
| San Andreas High (continuation) | Public | 31 | — | -65% |
| Creekside High | Public | 61 | — | +629% |
| El Camino High | Public | 65 | — | +26% |
| Marin Oaks High | Public | 63 | — | +27% |
| North Bay Met Academy | Public | 28 | — | -76% |
| Windsor Oaks Academy | Public | 38 | — | -24% |
| Madrone High Continuation | Public | 50 | — | -32% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →