Sanger Academy Charter

· Fresno County · Sanger Unified
Public Fresno County 🏛 Sanger Unified → CDS 1062414…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Quail Lake Environmental Charter → Parlier Junior High → Silas Bartsch → Fowler High School → Orange Cove High School → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Sanger Academy Charter.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
616 (2018)612 (2026)
-0.6%

If this trend holds (-0.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~612 +0 $0
3 yr (2029) ~611 -1 $0
5 yr (2031) ~610 -2 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Fresno County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
99.3%
607 of 611 students

4 of 611 students who enrolled at Sanger Academy Charter this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (0.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Fresno County median
86.8% · school is in the 100th percentile of 70 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 100th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (554) 99.5%
Socio. disadvantaged (436) 99.5%
English learners (58) 98.3%
Students w/ disabilities (51) 98.0%
White (23) 95.7%
Asian (22) 100.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Quail Lake Environmental Charter 95.8% Parlier Junior High 89.6% Silas Bartsch 90.4% Fowler High School 92.3% Orange Cove High School 87.4%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
7.4%
45 of 609 students

Absenteeism is up 5.3 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Fresno County median
20.6% · school is better than 87% of 69 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Sanger Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$249.0M
+46.4% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$19,722
12,625 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 58.1%
Local: 29.9%
Federal: 12.0%
Instruction share
54.9%
of current spending · $7,334/pupil
Long-term debt
$279.3M
+93.1% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Sanger Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Sanger Academy Charter — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-0.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~611 by 2029 — about 1 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

612 students (2026)
~611 projected (2029)
at -0.1%/yr

That's about 1 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Sanger Academy Charter Public 612
Peer-group median 16.4% -3%
Quail Lake Environmental Charter Public 600
Parlier Junior High Public 525
Silas Bartsch Public 606
Fowler High School Public 796 25.6% +8%
Orange Cove High School Public 588 7.1% -17%
Parlier High School Public 947 3.2% -3%
University High School Public 501 106.6% +4%
Cambridge Continuation High Public 447 -8%
Hallmark Charter School Public
Rafer Johnson Junior High Public 432

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →