Prospect High (continuation)

· Contra Costa County · Mt. Diablo Unified
Public Contra Costa County 🏛 Mt. Diablo Unified → CDS 0761754…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Glenbrook Academy → Vicente Martinez High → Liberty High → Berkeley Technology Academy → Golden Gate Community School → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Prospect High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
53 (2018)35 (2026)
-34.0%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
31 (2018)25 (2026)
-19.4%

If this trend holds (-5.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~33 -2 $0
3 yr (2029) ~30 -5 $0
5 yr (2031) ~27 -8 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Contra Costa County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -19.4% vs. county -3.2% AND stability (44.8%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 96.3% (up +28.4 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-19.4%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-3.2%  Contra Costa County baseline
-16.2pp  gap vs. county
44.8%  retention (county median 89.5%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
44.8%
43 of 96 students

53 of 96 students who enrolled at Prospect High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (55.2% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Contra Costa County median
89.5% · school is in the 13th percentile of 45 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 14th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (64) 46.9%
Hispanic / Latino (57) 52.6%
White (26) 34.6%
English learners (22) 63.6%

Nearest peer high schools

Glenbrook Academy 68.2% Vicente Martinez High 37.2% Liberty High 37.3% Berkeley Technology Academy 54.7% Golden Gate Community School 33.3%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
96.3%
78 of 81 students

Absenteeism is up 28.4 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Contra Costa County median
22.1% · school is worse than 100% of 45 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 14
21.4%
incl. 14.3% exceeded
-30.4 pts vs. Contra Costa County median (51.8%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 12
16.7%
incl. 8.3% exceeded
-6.3 pts vs. Contra Costa County median (23.0%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 60% -6.7
White 31% +7.4
Black / African Am. 6% +4.4
Asian 3%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 40% +10.7

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Mt. Diablo Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$481.4M
+9.2% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$16,095
29,908 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 42.0%
Local: 47.2%
Federal: 10.9%
Instruction share
60.0%
of current spending · $7,575/pupil
Long-term debt
$420.1M
-6.8% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Mt. Diablo Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Prospect High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 19% (31→25 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -7%.
  • At its recent rate (-5.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~30 by 2029 — about 5 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

35 students (2026)
~30 projected (2029)
at -5.1%/yr

That's about 5 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Prospect High (continuation) Public 35 -19%
Peer-group median -7%
Glenbrook Academy Public 32 +300%
Vicente Martinez High Public 53 -18%
Liberty High Public 48 -23%
Berkeley Technology Academy Public 52 +5%
Golden Gate Community School Public 74 -38%
Millennium High Alternative Public 75 +6%
Willow High Public 14 -47%
Street Academy Alternative High Public 83 +4%
Alternatives in Action Hs Public 86 +440%
Dewey High School Public 127 -52%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →