Phoenix Elementary Academy Community Day

· Fresno County · Fresno Unified
Public Fresno County 🏛 Fresno Unified → CDS 1062166…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Elm High → Violet Heintz Education Academy → Independence Continuation High → Enterprise High → Crescent View West Charter Sch → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Phoenix Elementary Academy Community Day.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
65 (2018)44 (2026)
-32.3%

If this trend holds (-4.8%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~42 -2 $0
3 yr (2029) ~38 -6 $0
5 yr (2031) ~34 -10 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Fresno County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
22.7%
17 of 75 students

58 of 75 students who enrolled at Phoenix Elementary Academy Community Day this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (77.3% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Fresno County median
86.8% · school is in the 4th percentile of 70 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 2nd percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (74) 23.0%
Hispanic / Latino (47) 17.0%
Students w/ disabilities (33) 27.3%

Nearest peer high schools

Elm High 15.3% Violet Heintz Education Academy 20.7% Independence Continuation High 40.0% Enterprise High 45.3%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
36.2%
25 of 69 students

Roughly one in three students is chronically absent. A floor this high signals systemic engagement problems beyond what any single intervention can fix.

Fresno County median
20.6% · school is worse than 75% of 69 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Fresno Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$1286.9M
+15.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$18,360
70,088 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 72.1%
Local: 12.4%
Federal: 15.6%
Instruction share
58.4%
of current spending · $9,375/pupil
Long-term debt
$836.3M
+29.3% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Fresno Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Phoenix Elementary Academy Community Day — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-4.8%/yr), enrollment projects to ~38 by 2029 — about 6 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

44 students (2026)
~38 projected (2029)
at -4.8%/yr

That's about 6 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Phoenix Elementary Academy Community Day Public 44
Peer-group median -20%
Elm High Public 47 -60%
Violet Heintz Education Academy Public 32 -62%
Independence Continuation High Public 50 +162%
Enterprise High Public 52 -25%
Crescent View West Charter Sch Public
Phillip J Patino Sch Entrepren Public
Madera County Independent Academy Public 52
Pershing Continuation High Public 105 -15%
Duncan Polytechnical Hs Public
Kings River High (continuation) Public 71 -12%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →