Parsons Junior High

· Shasta County · Enterprise Elementary
Public Shasta County 🏛 Enterprise Elementary → CDS 4569971…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Shasta View Academy → Buckeye School Of The Arts → Redding School Of The Arts → Anderson High → Central Valley High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Parsons Junior High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
559 (2018)519 (2026)
-7.2%

If this trend holds (-0.9%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~514 -5 $0
3 yr (2029) ~505 -14 $0
5 yr (2031) ~495 -24 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Shasta County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
83.7%
481 of 575 students

94 of 575 students who enrolled at Parsons Junior High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (16.3% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Shasta County median
81.9% · school is in the 60th percentile of 30 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 30th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (485) 82.5%
White (251) 83.7%
Hispanic / Latino (150) 83.3%
Students w/ disabilities (86) 87.2%
Asian (67) 92.5%
Two or more races (67) 80.6%

Nearest peer high schools

Shasta View Academy 88.9% Buckeye School Of The Arts 71.4% Redding School Of The Arts 79.8% Anderson High 81.0% Central Valley High 82.3%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
11.3%
63 of 557 students

Low and stable absenteeism — students are engaged and showing up. The leading indicator is healthy.

Shasta County median
18.5% · school is better than 67% of 30 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Enterprise Elementary (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$62.1M
+20.8% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$16,877
3,680 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 59.6%
Local: 20.4%
Federal: 20.0%
Instruction share
57.1%
of current spending · $7,778/pupil
Long-term debt
$34.2M
+74.2% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Enterprise Elementary as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Parsons Junior High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-0.9%/yr), enrollment projects to ~505 by 2029 — about 14 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

519 students (2026)
~505 projected (2029)
at -0.9%/yr

That's about 14 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Parsons Junior High Public 519
Peer-group median 4.3% +15%
Shasta View Academy Public 538 +15%
Buckeye School Of The Arts Public 465
Redding School Of The Arts Public 664 +29%
Anderson High Public 497 -15%
Central Valley High Public 598 2.9% +10%
Tree Of Life International Charter Public 424
Shasta Charter Academy Public 280 3.8% -16%
West Cottonwood Junior High Public 428
University Preparatory School Public 1004 34.7% +24%
Enterprise High School Public 1123 4.8% +23%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →