Mt. Pleasant High

· Santa Clara County · East Side Union High
Public Santa Clara County 🏛 East Side Union High → CDS 4369427…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

San Jose High School → James Lick High School → William C. Overfelt High → Kathleen Macdonald High → University Preparatory Academy Charter → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Mt. Pleasant High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
1,292 (2018)931 (2026)
-27.9%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
325 (2018)277 (2026)
-14.8%

If this trend holds (-4.0%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~894 -37 $0
3 yr (2029) ~823 -108 $0
5 yr (2031) ~759 -172 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Santa Clara County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Bleeding from both ends.

Enrollment down 14.8% vs. county -6.2%, AND stability (86.2%) below the county median. Fewer families are choosing the school, and the ones who do aren't staying through year-end.

-14.8%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-6.2%  Santa Clara County baseline
-8.6pp  gap vs. county
86.2%  retention (county median 90.2%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
86.2%
946 of 1,098 students

152 of 1,098 students who enrolled at Mt. Pleasant High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (13.8% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Santa Clara County median
90.2% · school is in the 35th percentile of 60 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 46th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (845) 85.1%
Hispanic / Latino (824) 85.1%
English learners (335) 78.2%
Students w/ disabilities (201) 78.1%
Asian (147) 92.5%
Filipino (45) 88.9%

Nearest peer high schools

San Jose High School 79.8% James Lick High School 81.8% William C. Overfelt High 86.1% Kathleen Macdonald High 89.5% University Preparatory Academy Charter 97.5%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
25.5%
270 of 1,059 students

Absenteeism is up 14.2 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Santa Clara County median
19.0% · school is worse than 57% of 58 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 236
50.9%
incl. 15.2% exceeded
-6.9 pts vs. Santa Clara County median (57.8%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 229
13.1%
incl. 3.9% exceeded
-18.1 pts vs. Santa Clara County median (31.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 76% +1.0
Asian 13% -1.0
Filipino 4%
White 3%
Two or more 2%
Black / African Am. 1%
American Indian 1%
Pacific Islander 0%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 83% +18.5
English learners 26%
Socioeconomically disadv. 17%
Homeless 4% -2.5

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — East Side Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$453.6M
+7.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$20,168
22,488 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 41.2%
Local: 51.7%
Federal: 7.1%
Instruction share
56.9%
of current spending · $7,561/pupil
Long-term debt
$1053.0M
+14.5% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the East Side Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Mt. Pleasant High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 15% (325→277 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -8%.
  • At its recent rate (-4.0%/yr), enrollment projects to ~823 by 2029 — about 108 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

931 students (2026)
~823 projected (2029)
at -4.0%/yr

That's about 108 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Mt. Pleasant High Public 931 -15%
Peer-group median 11.8% -8%
San Jose High School Public 904 7.9% -11%
James Lick High School Public 788 8.0% -9%
William C. Overfelt High Public 1357 11.8% -9%
Kathleen Macdonald High Public 852 +20100%
University Preparatory Academy Charter Public 731 +12%
Gunderson High Public 714 -24%
Oak Grove High School Public 1288 14.4% -21%
Yerba Buena High School Public 1555 33.6% -5%
Andrew P Hill High School Public 1497 12.0% -7%
Del Mar High School Public 1318 10.4% +22%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →