Moorpark High School
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Thousand Oaks High School → Royal High School → Westlake High School → Newbury Park High School → Oak Park High School → Compare all similar →Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (-2.2%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~1,581 | -35 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~1,513 | -103 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~1,448 | -168 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Ventura County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Moorpark High School is shrinking (-8.1%) but Ventura County is shrinking faster (-10.3%), so Moorpark High School is winning roughly 2.2 pp of relative market share. Combined with 93.5% stability (county median 89.0%), this reflects a school that families actively chose during a market contraction. Replicable model — worth documenting what's working.
113 of 1,740 students who enrolled at Moorpark High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (6.5% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 9.1 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
District financial profile — Moorpark Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 39.6%
Federal: 10.2%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Moorpark Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
-9.2 pp vs. peer median (22.6%) · Ranked #9 of 11 similar schools
18.5%
22.6%
53.3%
13.4%
Higher than 34% of California high schools (1105 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Moorpark High School's UC Reach of 13.4% is below the California median (18.5%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 53.3% or higher.
Overall, Moorpark High School's UC Reach is higher than 34% of California high schools (1105 ranked).
Moorpark High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · Moorpark · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Moorpark High School sits near the bottom of its similar-school group (ranked #9 of 11): 13% vs. a peer median of 23%.
- ▸Its UC Reach has slipped 9 points since 2018 — worth watching.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is down 8% (472→434 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -14%.
- ▸In business terms, this is market-share growth during a market contraction. Ventura County's senior population shrank 10% over the same window — Moorpark High School only shrank 8%. So Moorpark High School picked up about 2 percentage points of relative share — families chose it over the alternatives even as the overall pool got smaller. That's overperforming the market in a shrinking market.
- ▸At its recent rate (-2.2%/yr), enrollment projects to ~1513 by 2029 — about 103 fewer students than today.
Enrollment projection
That's about 103 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.
Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moorpark High School | Public | 1616 | 13.4% | -8% |
| Peer-group median | 22.6% | -14% | ||
| Thousand Oaks High School | Public | 1673 | 19.4% | -31% |
| Royal High School | Public | 1751 | 20.1% | -12% |
| Westlake High School | Public | 1738 | 50.2% | -15% |
| Newbury Park High School | Public | 1982 | 26.7% | -20% |
| Oak Park High School | Public | 1489 | 56.4% | -0% |
| Adolfo Camarillo High School | Public | 2061 | 25.0% | -17% |
| Agoura High School | Public | 1697 | 25.3% | -32% |
| Santa Paula High School | Public | 1456 | 19.8% | +2% |
| Simi Valley High School | Public | 1947 | 13.4% | -9% |
| Rio Mesa High School | Public | 1836 | 10.1% | -3% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
UC funnel — which kids are getting in at what GPA
Combining the school's applicant pool GPA, admit pool GPA, actual admit rate, and statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, we can read which GPA tiers tend to get in — and which don't.
| Campus | 4.00+ GPA | 3.70–3.99 GPA | 3.30–3.69 GPA | < 3.30 GPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out | Filtered out |
| UCLA | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out | Filtered out |
| UC San Diego | Strong shot | Moderate | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Santa Barbara | Strong shot | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Irvine | Strong shot | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Davis | Strong shot | Strong shot | Real shot | Filtered out |
The numbers behind it
| Campus | Applicant GPA | Admit GPA | Lift ⓘ | Admit rate | vs peer schools @ same GPA ⓘ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley (2023) | 4.09 | 4.03 | -0.06 | 17.4% | Peers +0.18 · wider |
| UCLA | 4.06 | 4.33 | +0.27 | 8.1% | Peers +0.23 · steeper |
| UC San Diego | 4.02 | 4.25 | +0.23 | 21.7% | Peers +0.25 · matches |
| UC Santa Barbara | 3.99 | 4.29 | +0.30 | 30.5% | Peers +0.27 · matches |
| UC Irvine | 3.99 | 4.21 | +0.22 | 21.3% | Peers +0.22 · matches |
| UC Davis | 4.02 | 4.22 | +0.21 | 37.8% | Peers +0.20 · matches |
📊 Statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, 2025 (for reference)
| GPA band | UCB | UCLA | UCSD | UCSB | UCI | UCD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.00+ | 17.0% | 15.1% | 45.2% | 62.3% | 46.3% | 65.9% |
| 3.70–3.99 | 3.1% | 1.6% | 9.3% | 17.6% | 17.0% | 31.1% |
| 3.30–3.69 | 0.8% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 10.3% |
| 3.00–3.29 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| < 3.00 | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.7% |
Where Moorpark High School sits vs. all California schools ⓘ
Overall, this school admits its UC applicants in line with what their GPAs predict (22.6% actual vs. 23.1% expected).
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | 4.08 | — |
| UCLA → Elite | 62 | 5 | 3 | 8.1% | 1.1% | 60.0% | 4.06 | 4.33 |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 60 | 13 | 5 | 21.7% | 2.9% | 38.5% | 4.02 | 4.25 |
| UC Santa Barbara → Selective | 59 | 18 | — | 30.5% | 4.0% | — | 3.99 | 4.29 |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 47 | 10 | — | 21.3% | 2.2% | — | 3.99 | 4.21 |
| UC Davis → | 37 | 14 | 3 | 37.8% | 3.1% | 21.4% | 4.02 | 4.22 |