Mare Island Technology Academy
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Loma Vista Environmental Science Academy → Mit Academy → John Swett High School → Mare Island Health And Fitness Academy → Griffin Academy High School → Compare all similar →Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (-4.3%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~282 | -13 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~258 | -37 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~236 | -59 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Solano County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
25 of 277 students who enrolled at Mare Island Technology Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (9.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.
Absenteeism is up 16.8 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
District financial profile — Vallejo City Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 28.5%
Federal: 12.4%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Vallejo City Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
On the peer median (12.8%) · Ranked #3 of 5 similar schools
18.5%
12.8%
53.3%
13.8%
Higher than 36% of California high schools (1105 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Mare Island Technology Academy's UC Reach of 13.8% is below the California median (18.5%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 53.3% or higher.
Overall, Mare Island Technology Academy's UC Reach is higher than 36% of California high schools (1105 ranked).
Mare Island Technology Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Mare Island Technology Academy sits in the middle of its similar-school group (ranked #3 of 5): 14% vs. a peer median of 13%.
- ▸Its UC Reach has held roughly steady since 2018.
- ▸At its recent rate (-4.3%/yr), enrollment projects to ~258 by 2029 — about 37 fewer students than today.
Enrollment projection
That's about 37 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.
Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mare Island Technology Academy | Public | 295 | 13.8% | — |
| Peer-group median | 12.8% | -4% | ||
| Loma Vista Environmental Science Academy | Public | 365 | — | — |
| Mit Academy | Public | 469 | 2.8% | +40% |
| John Swett High School | Public | 364 | 18.7% | -24% |
| Mare Island Health And Fitness Academy | Public | 423 | — | — |
| Griffin Academy High School | Public | 168 | 6.9% | +9% |
| Middle College High | Public | 290 | 70.8% | -4% |
| Highland Elementary | Public | 507 | — | — |
| Sem Yeto Continuation High | Public | 302 | — | -24% |
| Vallejo Charter | Public | 508 | — | — |
| Cave Language Academy | Public | 531 | — | — |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Admit rate vs. CA peer average, by campus ⓘ
How does this school's admit rate at each UC compare to other CA schools whose applicant pool averages the same GPA?
| Campus | Applicant GPA (avg) | Actual admit rate | CA peer avg | Δ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Santa Barbara | 3.83 | 42.9% | 26.9% | +15.9pp | Over |
| UC Davis | 3.87 | 40.0% | 32.2% | +7.8pp | Over |
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.88 | — |
| UCLA → Elite | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.80 | — |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.90 | — |
| UC Santa Barbara → Selective | 7 | 3 | — | 42.9% | 4.6% | — | 3.83 | — |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.75 | — |
| UC Davis → | 15 | 6 | 6 | 40.0% | 9.2% | 100.0% | 3.87 | 4.04 |