No UC admissions data on file for Learning By Design Charter.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
45 (2019)174 (2026)
+286.7%

If this trend holds (+21.3%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~211 +37 $0
3 yr (2029) ~311 +137 $0
5 yr (2031) ~457 +283 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
73.2%
104 of 142 students

38 of 142 students who enrolled at Learning By Design Charter this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (26.8% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Los Angeles County median
89.1% · school is in the 14th percentile of 676 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 17th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (120) 74.2%
Black / African Am. (82) 67.1%
Hispanic / Latino (55) 83.6%

Nearest peer high schools

Invictus Leadership Academy 72.4% Horace Mann UCLA Community Sch 81.7% Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle 97.1% Icef View Park Preparatory Middle 90.5% Teach Preparatory Mildred S. Cunningham & Edith H. Morris Elementary 86.3%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
31.1%
42 of 135 students

Absenteeism is down 4.6 pp since 2018-19. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Los Angeles County median
22.7% · school is worse than 74% of 669 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Los Angeles Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$11112.5M
+8.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$24,124
460,633 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 51.7%
Local: 29.8%
Federal: 18.5%
Instruction share
53.5%
of current spending · $10,061/pupil
Long-term debt
$11908.4M
+4.3% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Los Angeles Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Learning By Design Charter — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Enrollment has been growing (+21.3%/yr); projects to ~311 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

174 students (2026)
~311 projected (2029)
at +21.3%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Learning By Design Charter Public 174
Peer-group median 12.0% -38%
Invictus Leadership Academy Public 183
Horace Mann UCLA Community Sch Public 151 12.0% -38%
Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle Public 217
Icef View Park Preparatory Middle Public 245
Teach Preparatory Mildred S. Cunningham & Edith H. Morris Elementary Public 256
Icef Innovation Los Angeles Charter Public 245
Catch Prep Charter High, Inc. Public 122 -39%
Crete Academy Public 284
City Honors International Preparatory High Public 284 -12%
Animo City Of Champions Charter High Public 306 -50%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →