Lassen High School
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Thompson Peak Charter → Oroville High School → Tahoe Truckee High School → Corning Union High School → John Muir Charter → Compare all similar →Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (-0.5%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~777 | -4 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~768 | -13 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~760 | -21 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Lassen County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment is shrinking faster than Lassen County (school +12.3% vs. county +21.6%) with stability (83.9%) near the county median. Two problems compounding — the recruitment side is the higher-leverage starting point.
138 of 859 students who enrolled at Lassen High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (16.1% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 10.2 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
District financial profile — Lassen Union High (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 40.2%
Federal: 6.9%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Lassen Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
-2.2 pp vs. peer median (5.0%) · Ranked #7 of 8 similar schools
18.5%
5.0%
53.3%
2.8%
Higher than 1% of California high schools (1105 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Lassen High School's UC Reach of 2.8% is below the California median (18.5%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 53.3% or higher.
Overall, Lassen High School's UC Reach is higher than 1% of California high schools (1105 ranked).
Lassen High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · Susanville · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Lassen High School sits near the bottom of its similar-school group (ranked #7 of 8): 3% vs. a peer median of 5%.
- ▸Its UC Reach has held roughly steady since 2018.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 12% (187→210 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -1%.
- ▸At its recent rate (-0.5%/yr), enrollment projects to ~768 by 2029 — about 13 fewer students than today.
Enrollment projection
That's about 13 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.
Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lassen High School | Public | 781 | 2.8% | +12% |
| Peer-group median | 5.0% | -1% | ||
| Thompson Peak Charter | Public | 174 | — | -32% |
| Oroville High School | Public | 830 | 5.0% | -6% |
| Tahoe Truckee High School | Public | 889 | 26.5% | +47% |
| Corning Union High School | Public | 941 | 2.0% | +8% |
| John Muir Charter | Public | 543 | — | -90% |
| Paradise High School | Public | 502 | 3.0% | -46% |
| Las Plumas High School | Public | 1271 | 13.6% | +13% |
| Core Butte Charter School | Public | 405 | — | -11% |
| Red Bluff High School | Public | 1567 | 9.9% | +4% |
| Nevada Union High School | Public | 1592 | 4.6% | +4% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Admit rate vs. CA peer average, by campus ⓘ
How does this school's admit rate at each UC compare to other CA schools whose applicant pool averages the same GPA?
| Campus | Applicant GPA (avg) | Actual admit rate | CA peer avg | Δ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Davis | 3.90 | 55.6% | 32.3% | +23.3pp | Over |
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | 4.20 | — |
| UCLA → Elite | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | 4.08 | — |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.97 | — |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | 4.12 | — |
| UC Davis → | 9 | 5 | — | 55.6% | 2.8% | — | 3.90 | 4.24 |