No UC admissions data on file for Judith F. Baca Arts Academy.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
750 (2018)442 (2026)
-41.1%

If this trend holds (-6.4%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~414 -28 $0
3 yr (2029) ~362 -80 $0
5 yr (2031) ~318 -124 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
82.3%
456 of 554 students

98 of 554 students who enrolled at Judith F. Baca Arts Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (17.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Los Angeles County median
89.1% · school is in the 24th percentile of 676 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 27th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (538) 82.7%
Hispanic / Latino (506) 83.0%
English learners (176) 82.4%
Students w/ disabilities (115) 84.3%
Black / African Am. (23) 73.9%

Nearest peer high schools

Animo Florence-Firestone Charter Middle 95.8% Russell Westbrook Why Not? High 79.1% Animo James B. Taylor Charter Middle 88.6% Performing Arts Community At Diego Rivera Learning Complex 82.2% Alliance Cindy And Bill Simon Technology Academy High 87.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
22.7%
121 of 534 students

Absenteeism is up 5.9 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Los Angeles County median
22.7% · school is worse than 50% of 669 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Los Angeles Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$11112.5M
+8.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$24,124
460,633 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 51.7%
Local: 29.8%
Federal: 18.5%
Instruction share
53.5%
of current spending · $10,061/pupil
Long-term debt
$11908.4M
+4.3% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Los Angeles Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Judith F. Baca Arts Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-6.4%/yr), enrollment projects to ~362 by 2029 — about 80 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

442 students (2026)
~362 projected (2029)
at -6.4%/yr

That's about 80 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Judith F. Baca Arts Academy Public 442
Peer-group median +3%
Animo Florence-Firestone Charter Middle Public 421
Russell Westbrook Why Not? High Public 429 +12%
Animo James B. Taylor Charter Middle Public 450
Performing Arts Community At Diego Rivera Learning Complex Public 444 -2%
Alliance Cindy And Bill Simon Technology Academy High Public 463 +8%
Bret Harte Preparatory Middle Public 439
Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math, Science, Technology Academy Public 419
Alliance College-Ready Middle Academy 4 Public 487
Ednovate - South La College Prep Public 413 -32%
Kipp Academy Of Opportunity Public 482

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →