John Hope Continuation

· Los Angeles County · Los Angeles Unified
Public Los Angeles County 🏛 Los Angeles Unified → CDS 1964733…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

University Pathways Public Service Academy → Odyssey Continuation → University Pathways Medical Magnet Academy → Horace Mann UCLA Community Sch → New Designs Charter Sch Watts → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for John Hope Continuation.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
71 (2018)107 (2026)
+50.7%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
9 (2018)18 (2026)
+100.0%

If this trend holds (+5.3%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~113 +6 $0
3 yr (2029) ~125 +18 $0
5 yr (2031) ~138 +31 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Demand outpacing county is masking internal churn.

Enrollment growth is beating Los Angeles County (+100.0% vs. -8.2%), but 163 of 169 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 92.1% (up +10.6 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

+100.0%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-8.2%  Los Angeles County baseline
+108.2pp  gap vs. county
3.6%  retention (county median 87.3%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
3.6%
6 of 169 students

163 of 169 students who enrolled at John Hope Continuation this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (96.4% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Los Angeles County median
87.3% · school is in the 0th percentile of 387 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 0th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (159) 3.8%
Hispanic / Latino (141) 2.8%
English learners (33) 6.1%
Black / African Am. (22) 4.5%

Nearest peer high schools

University Pathways Public Service Academy 79.1% Odyssey Continuation 40.1% University Pathways Medical Magnet Academy 85.5% Horace Mann UCLA Community Sch 81.7% New Designs Charter Sch Watts 77.7%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
92.1%
139 of 151 students

Absenteeism is up 10.6 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Los Angeles County median
25.2% · school is worse than 98% of 381 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 35
5.7%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-52.3 pts vs. Los Angeles County median (58.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 35
2.9%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-22.1 pts vs. Los Angeles County median (25.0%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 78% -9.2
Black / African Am. 17% +8.2
White 2% -1.8
Two or more 1%
American Indian 1%
Not reported 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 98% +10.4

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Los Angeles Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$11112.5M
+8.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$24,124
460,633 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 51.7%
Local: 29.8%
Federal: 18.5%
Instruction share
53.5%
of current spending · $10,061/pupil
Long-term debt
$11908.4M
+4.3% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Los Angeles Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

John Hope Continuation — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 100% (9→18 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -19%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+5.3%/yr); projects to ~125 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

107 students (2026)
~125 projected (2029)
at +5.3%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
John Hope Continuation Public 107 +100%
Peer-group median 10.8% -19%
University Pathways Public Service Academy Public 100 9.5% -27%
Odyssey Continuation Public 104 -30%
University Pathways Medical Magnet Academy Public 93 +64%
Horace Mann UCLA Community Sch Public 151 12.0% -38%
New Designs Charter Sch Watts Public 145 -13%
San Antonio Continuation Public 72 -25%
Boys Academic Leadership Academy Public 65 +33%
Simon Rodia Continuation Public 60 -62%
Animo Compton Charter School Public 190 +14%
Matrix For Success Academy Public 265 +780%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →