Imperial Ave. Holbrook High

· Imperial County · Imperial Unified
Public Imperial County 🏛 Imperial Unified → CDS 1363164…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Sam Webb Continuation → Aurora High (continuation) → Hillside Junior/Senior High → Desert Oasis High (continuation) → Elite Academy → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Imperial Ave. Holbrook High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
46 (2018)28 (2026)
-39.1%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
7 (2018)11 (2026)
+57.1%

If this trend holds (-6.0%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~26 -2 $0
3 yr (2029) ~23 -5 $0
5 yr (2031) ~21 -7 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Imperial County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Demand outpacing county is masking internal churn.

Enrollment growth is beating Imperial County (+57.1% vs. +9.3%), but 52 of 65 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 57.1% (up +57.1 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

+57.1%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+9.3%  Imperial County baseline
+47.8pp  gap vs. county
20.0%  retention (county median 88.4%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
20.0%
13 of 65 students

52 of 65 students who enrolled at Imperial Ave. Holbrook High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (80.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Imperial County median
88.4% · school is in the 0th percentile of 12 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 2nd percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (56) 19.6%
Socio. disadvantaged (50) 20.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Sam Webb Continuation 0.0% Aurora High (continuation) 29.1% Hillside Junior/Senior High 36.6% Desert Oasis High (continuation) 47.0% Elite Academy 75.0%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
57.1%
32 of 56 students

Absenteeism is up 57.1 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Imperial County median
27.6% · school is worse than 75% of 12 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 11
27.3%
incl. 18.2% exceeded
-21.4 pts vs. Imperial County median (48.7%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 18
5.6%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-10.8 pts vs. Imperial County median (16.4%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 82% -5.7
White 14% +6.1
Filipino 4%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 39% -1.5

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Imperial Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$73.5M
+44.3% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$16,956
4,335 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 73.5%
Local: 18.2%
Federal: 8.3%
Instruction share
62.8%
of current spending · $7,806/pupil
Long-term debt
$47.1M
-4.9% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Imperial Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Imperial Ave. Holbrook High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 57% (7→11 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -24%.
  • At its recent rate (-6.0%/yr), enrollment projects to ~23 by 2029 — about 5 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

28 students (2026)
~23 projected (2029)
at -6.0%/yr

That's about 5 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Imperial Ave. Holbrook High Public 28 +57%
Peer-group median -24%
Sam Webb Continuation Public 15 -67%
Aurora High (continuation) Public 82 +5%
Hillside Junior/Senior High Public 27 +233%
Desert Oasis High (continuation) Public 135 +131%
Elite Academy Public 31 +156%
Chaparral High Public 35 -56%
Sunrise High (continuation) Public 22 +275%
San Pasqual Academy Public 36 -62%
San Pasqual Academy Public 36 -81%
Reach Academy Public 21 -52%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →