Diamond Technology Institute

Watsonville · Santa Cruz County · Pajaro Valley Unified
Public Santa Cruz County 🏛 Pajaro Valley Unified → CDS 4469799…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Renaissance High Continuation → Delta Charter → Costanoa Continuation High → Alternative Family Education → Mt. Madonna High → Compare all similar →

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
66 (2018)89 (2026)
+34.8%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
5 (2018)15 (2026)
+200.0%

If this trend holds (+3.8%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~92 +3 $0
3 yr (2029) ~100 +11 $0
5 yr (2031) ~107 +18 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Santa Cruz County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Healthy
Best in class — winning on demand and retention.

Diamond Technology Institute outperformed Santa Cruz County on enrollment (school +200.0% vs. county +3.1%) AND maintains 93.2% stability. Replicable model — worth documenting what's working.

+200.0%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+3.1%  Santa Cruz County baseline
+196.9pp  gap vs. county
93.2%  retention (county median 90.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
93.2%
82 of 88 students

6 of 88 students who enrolled at Diamond Technology Institute this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (6.8% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Santa Cruz County median
90.8% · school is in the 80th percentile of 15 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 81st percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (82) 92.7%
Socio. disadvantaged (68) 92.6%

Nearest peer high schools

Renaissance High Continuation 28.3% Delta Charter 83.5% Costanoa Continuation High 44.0% Alternative Family Education 70.7% Mt. Madonna High 28.4%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
16.1%
14 of 87 students

Absenteeism is down 15.3 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Santa Cruz County median
18.8% · school is better than 64% of 14 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 15
66.7%
incl. 26.7% exceeded
On the Santa Cruz County median (66.1%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 14
7.1%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-27.1 pts vs. Santa Cruz County median (34.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 94% +5.2
White 4% -1.5
Two or more 1% -1.3

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 80% +5.1

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Pajaro Valley Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$341.2M
+16.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$18,204
18,743 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 54.9%
Local: 28.7%
Federal: 16.4%
Instruction share
52.9%
of current spending · $8,526/pupil
Long-term debt
$203.6M
+2.5% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Pajaro Valley Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

University of California outcomes · Class of 2024
UC Reach
N/A
(class size est.)
UC Application Reach
N/A
None applications
UC Admit Rate
N/A
None / None applications
UC Yield Rate
N/A
None enrolled of None admitted
Yield vs. Enrollment Reach: Yield answers "of UC admits, what % chose UC?" — denominator is just the admits. A small admitted cohort can post a low yield even when the school sends a healthy share of its class to UC.
UC Enrollment Reach
N/A
None enrollees / None seniors
Enrollment Reach vs. Yield: Reach answers "of the whole senior class, what % ended up at UC?" — denominator is everyone. High Yield with low Enrollment Reach is common at elite privates: most admits matriculate, but the school sends most of its class to non-UC selective colleges.
Student-Counselor Ratio
89:1
1.0 FTE counselors · 89 students
In context: CA median 338:1 · 249 fewer students per counselor · ASCA target 250:1.
Selective UC Reach (UCSD, UCSB, UCI, UCD)
N/A
Elite UC Reach (UCB + UCLA)
N/A
Senior Class Size
N/A
Run CDE download to enable Reach %
Total School Enrollment
83
All grades · CDE Census Day

Diamond Technology Institute — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · Watsonville · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 200% (5→15 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -17%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+3.8%/yr); projects to ~100 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

89 students (2026)
~100 projected (2029)
at +3.8%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Diamond Technology Institute Public 89 +200%
Peer-group median -17%
Renaissance High Continuation Public 82 -32%
Delta Charter Public 114 -29%
Costanoa Continuation High Public 67 +0%
Alternative Family Education Public 123 -62%
Mt. Madonna High Public 141 -43%
Santa Cruz County Career Advancement Charter Public 235 +390%
Central Coast High School Public 98 +40%
Central High (continuation) Public 63 -43%
Slvusd Charter School Public 110 +76%
San Andreas Continuation High Public 75 -5%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Campus Breakdown — 2024

Campus Applicants Admits Enrollees Admit Rate UC Reach Yield Avg GPA (App) Avg GPA (Adm)
UC Berkeley → Elite
UCLA → Elite
UC Irvine → Selective
UC Davis →
⚠ Campus-level totals may count one student admitted to multiple UC campuses more than once. Admit Volume metrics are not the same as UC Reach, which requires unique-student counts. See methodology →

What This Means

Note: admit counts used here are campus-level totals. A student admitted to both UCLA and UCSD is counted twice. When UCOP unique-student data becomes available it will be loaded automatically and the labels will update.
Senior class size is estimated from CDE grade 12 enrollment data. Reach percentages should be interpreted as approximate.
Compare with other schools → See Santa Cruz County rankings →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →