No UC admissions data on file for Cox Academy.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
587 (2018)444 (2026)
-24.4%

If this trend holds (-3.4%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~429 -15 $0
3 yr (2029) ~400 -44 $0
5 yr (2031) ~373 -71 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Alameda County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
89.9%
418 of 465 students

47 of 465 students who enrolled at Cox Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (10.1% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Alameda County median
89.9% · school is in the 51st percentile of 107 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 58th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (432) 90.0%
Hispanic / Latino (361) 91.7%
English learners (237) 93.7%
Black / African Am. (70) 82.9%
Students w/ disabilities (56) 89.3%

Nearest peer high schools

Highland Community 87.6% Reach Academy Elementary 79.1% East Bay Innovation Academy 87.9% Aspire Lionel Wilson College Preparatory Academy 91.8% Aspire Golden State College Preparatory Academy 85.8%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
7.7%
35 of 453 students

Absenteeism is down 10.0 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Alameda County median
25.1% · school is better than 90% of 106 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Alameda County Office of Education (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$71.1M
+17.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$246,162
289 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 27.4%
Local: 67.2%
Federal: 5.4%
Instruction share
14.6%
of current spending · $23,103/pupil
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Alameda County Office of Education as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Cox Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-3.4%/yr), enrollment projects to ~400 by 2029 — about 44 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

444 students (2026)
~400 projected (2029)
at -3.4%/yr

That's about 44 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Cox Academy Public 444
Peer-group median 27.4% +8%
Highland Community Public 452
Reach Academy Elementary Public 416
East Bay Innovation Academy Public 481 42.3% +72%
Aspire Lionel Wilson College Preparatory Academy Public 395 +8%
Aspire Golden State College Preparatory Academy Public 404 -19%
Aspire Monarch Academy Public 373
Life Academy High School Public 434 27.4% -5%
Francophone Charter School Of Oakland Public 366
Arise High School Public 410 19.4% +77%
Kipp Summit Academy Public 429

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →