No UC admissions data on file for Bowman (jereann) High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
415 (2018)268 (2026)
-35.4%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
319 (2018)194 (2026)
-39.2%

If this trend holds (-5.3%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~254 -14 $0
3 yr (2029) ~227 -41 $0
5 yr (2031) ~204 -64 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -39.2% vs. county -8.2% AND stability (39.5%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 68.9% (up +7.0 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-39.2%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-8.2%  Los Angeles County baseline
-31.0pp  gap vs. county
39.5%  retention (county median 87.3%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
39.5%
145 of 367 students

222 of 367 students who enrolled at Bowman (jereann) High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (60.5% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Los Angeles County median
87.3% · school is in the 11th percentile of 387 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 12th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (302) 37.4%
Hispanic / Latino (287) 41.5%
Students w/ disabilities (68) 33.8%
White (56) 41.1%
English learners (49) 40.8%

Nearest peer high schools

Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Arts/theatre/entertain Mag 87.3% Academy of the Canyons 99.2% Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Technology Preparatory Academy 80.6% Valley International Preparatory High 87.1% Puc Early College Academy For Leaders And Scholars (ecals) 85.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
68.9%
215 of 312 students

Absenteeism is up 7.0 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Los Angeles County median
25.2% · school is worse than 89% of 381 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 127
20.5%
incl. 2.4% exceeded
-37.5 pts vs. Los Angeles County median (58.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 128
2.3%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-22.7 pts vs. Los Angeles County median (25.0%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 78%
White 16% +3.3
Black / African Am. 3%
Two or more 1%
Asian 1% -1.3
American Indian 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 86% +28.1
Homeless 39% +26.1
Socioeconomically disadv. 23% +14.3
English learners 6% -3.5

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — William S. Hart Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$437.9M
+40.2% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$20,101
21,786 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 68.9%
Local: 25.6%
Federal: 5.5%
Instruction share
53.1%
of current spending · $6,775/pupil
Long-term debt
$456.2M
+3.1% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the William S. Hart Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Bowman (jereann) High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 39% (319→194 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -18%.
  • At its recent rate (-5.3%/yr), enrollment projects to ~227 by 2029 — about 41 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

268 students (2026)
~227 projected (2029)
at -5.3%/yr

That's about 41 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Bowman (jereann) High (continuation) Public 268 -39%
Peer-group median 37.5% -18%
Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Arts/theatre/entertain Mag Public 267 -32%
Academy of the Canyons Public 375 68.0% -2%
Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Technology Preparatory Academy Public 278 -15%
Valley International Preparatory High Public 290 -20%
Puc Early College Academy For Leaders And Scholars (ecals) Public 191 -33%
Discovery Charter Prep School Public 176 7.1% -6%
Bert Corona Charter High Public 196 +257%
Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Academy Of Scientific Exploration (ase) Public 397 -17%
Puc Lakeview Charter High Public 451 -19%
Cesar E. Chavez Learning Academies-Social Justice Humanitas Academy Public 432 -24%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →