Birmingham Community Charter High
· Los Angeles County · Los Angeles Unified · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Grover Cleveland Charter High → El Camino Real Charter High → North Hollywood High School → Taft Charter High → John F. Kennedy High → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- Program details not reported to CRDC
- Academic signals not yet ingested for this school
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How Birmingham Community Charter High compares for families
Above-average college outcomes statewide.
- ▸ Statewide29.3% UC Reach — 11.2 points above the California median of 18.1%. Ahead of 73% of California high schools.
- ▸ Locally📘 Top 10% in California on ELA proficiency.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsBeats the peer median (29.3% UC Reach vs 25.8% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.
Birmingham Community Charter High sent 925 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 22.6% were admitted, producing a UC Reach of 29.3% — 11.2 percentage points above the California median of 18.1%, higher than 73% of California high schools. The school produces 5.6 UCLA + UC Berkeley admits per 100 seniors.
+3.5 pp above peer median (25.8%) · Ranked #3 of 8 similar schools
18.1%
25.8%
51.2%
29.3%
Higher than 73% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Birmingham Community Charter High's UC Reach of 29.3% is above the California median (18.1%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 51.2% or higher.
For context, the elite tier (top 1%) clears 97.3% — a gap of 68 pp from where this school sits.
Overall, Birmingham Community Charter High's UC Reach is higher than 73% of California high schools (978 ranked).
UC funnel — which kids are getting in at what GPA
Combining the school's applicant pool GPA, admit pool GPA, actual admit rate, and statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, we can read which GPA tiers tend to get in — and which don't.
| Campus | 4.00+ GPA | 3.70–3.99 GPA | 3.30–3.69 GPA | < 3.30 GPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out | Filtered out |
| UCLA | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out | Filtered out |
| UC San Diego | Strong shot | Moderate | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Santa Barbara | Strong shot | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Irvine | Strong shot | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Davis | Strong shot | Strong shot | Real shot | Filtered out |
The numbers behind it
| Campus | Applicant GPA | Admit GPA | Lift ⓘ | Admit rate | vs peer schools @ same GPA ⓘ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | 3.76 | 4.12 | +0.36 | 16.7% | Peers +0.38 · matches |
| UCLA | 3.69 | 4.13 | +0.45 | 8.5% | Peers +0.47 · matches |
| UC San Diego | 3.67 | 4.03 | +0.36 | 38.1% | Peers +0.42 · wider |
| UC Santa Barbara | 3.65 | 4.12 | +0.47 | 25.9% | Peers +0.40 · steeper |
| UC Irvine | 3.69 | 4.04 | +0.36 | 12.2% | Peers +0.40 · wider |
| UC Davis | 3.71 | 3.96 | +0.25 | 50.0% | Peers +0.35 · wider |
📊 Statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, 2025 (for reference)
| GPA band | UCB | UCLA | UCSD | UCSB | UCI | UCD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.00+ | 17.0% | 15.1% | 45.2% | 62.3% | 46.3% | 65.9% |
| 3.70–3.99 | 3.1% | 1.6% | 9.3% | 17.6% | 17.0% | 31.1% |
| 3.30–3.69 | 0.8% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 10.3% |
| 3.00–3.29 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| < 3.00 | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.7% |
Where Birmingham Community Charter High sits vs. all California schools ⓘ
Overall, this school admits its UC applicants in line with what their GPAs predict (22.6% actual vs. 20.1% expected).
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 126 | 21 | 8 | 16.7% | 2.9% | 38.1% | 3.76 | 4.12 |
| UCLA → Elite | 224 | 19 | 12 | 8.5% | 2.7% | 63.2% | 3.69 | 4.13 |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 155 | 59 | 16 | 38.1% | 8.3% | 27.1% | 3.67 | 4.03 |
| UC Santa Barbara → Selective | 170 | 44 | 9 | 25.9% | 6.2% | 20.5% | 3.65 | 4.12 |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 156 | 19 | 3 | 12.2% | 2.7% | 15.8% | 3.69 | 4.04 |
| UC Davis → | 94 | 47 | 9 | 50.0% | 6.6% | 19.1% | 3.71 | 3.96 |
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 6.3 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+0.4%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~3,272 | +13 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~3,299 | +40 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~3,326 | +67 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Birmingham Community Charter High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Birmingham Community Charter High sits in the middle of its similar-school group (ranked #3 of 8): 29% vs. a peer median of 26%.
- ▸Birmingham Community Charter High's UC Reach has stepped down from a peak of 36% in 2023 to 29% in 2025 — a 7-point decline worth tracking.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is down 9% (808→736 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -2%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+0.4%/yr); projects to ~3299 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham Community Charter High | Public | 3259 | 29.3% | -9% |
| Peer-group median | 25.8% | -2% | ||
| Grover Cleveland Charter High | Public | 2633 | — | +0% |
| El Camino Real Charter High | Public | 2896 | — | -18% |
| North Hollywood High School | Public | 2461 | 47.3% | -2% |
| Taft Charter High | Public | 2157 | — | -15% |
| John F. Kennedy High | Public | 2167 | 22.5% | +12% |
| Van Nuys High School | Public | 1773 | 28.7% | -8% |
| John H Francis Polytechnic Hs | Public | 1965 | 12.9% | -28% |
| James Monroe High School | Public | 1732 | 14.4% | +1% |
| Granada Hills Charter High Sch | Public | 6140 | 32.9% | +2% |
| Ulysses S Grant High School | Public | 1610 | 25.8% | -3% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment and retention both close to Los Angeles County baseline. The demographic tide is the main mover; no internal break in the system, but no outperformance either. Chronic absenteeism is rising (21.1%, +6.3 pts since 2016-17) — a watch signal worth monitoring as a leading indicator.
377 of 3,351 students who enrolled at Birmingham Community Charter High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (11.3% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Los Angeles Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 29.8%
Federal: 18.5%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Los Angeles Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).