Abraham Lincoln Continuation

· Riverside County · Riverside Unified
Public Riverside County 🏛 Riverside Unified → CDS 3367215…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Raincross High (continuation) → Mission View High → Alvord High → Leadership Military Academy → Nueva Vista Continuation High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Abraham Lincoln Continuation.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
151 (2018)99 (2026)
-34.4%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
103 (2018)89 (2026)
-13.6%

If this trend holds (-5.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~94 -5 $0
3 yr (2029) ~85 -14 $0
5 yr (2031) ~76 -23 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Riverside County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -13.6% vs. county -2.7% AND stability (37.7%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 76.6% (up +7.4 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-13.6%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-2.7%  Riverside County baseline
-10.9pp  gap vs. county
37.7%  retention (county median 85.4%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
37.7%
80 of 212 students

132 of 212 students who enrolled at Abraham Lincoln Continuation this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (62.3% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Riverside County median
85.4% · school is in the 15th percentile of 94 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 11th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (198) 39.4%
Hispanic / Latino (177) 39.5%
English learners (61) 36.1%

Nearest peer high schools

Raincross High (continuation) 32.4% Mission View High 33.8% Alvord High 28.7% Leadership Military Academy 60.3% Nueva Vista Continuation High 37.5%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
76.6%
151 of 197 students

Absenteeism is up 7.4 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Riverside County median
28.9% · school is worse than 94% of 94 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 67
9.0%
incl. 4.5% exceeded
-40.7 pts vs. Riverside County median (49.7%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 67
1.5%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-14.2 pts vs. Riverside County median (15.7%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 86% +4.6
White 4% -2.4
Asian 4% +2.8
Black / African Am. 3%
Not reported 2% -4.4
Two or more 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 82% +19.8
English learners 26% +2.9

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Riverside Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$656.4M
+15.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$16,640
39,443 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 62.2%
Local: 24.6%
Federal: 13.2%
Instruction share
60.5%
of current spending · $8,767/pupil
Long-term debt
$335.9M
+30.2% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Riverside Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Abraham Lincoln Continuation — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 14% (103→89 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -17%.
  • At its recent rate (-5.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~85 by 2029 — about 14 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

99 students (2026)
~85 projected (2029)
at -5.1%/yr

That's about 14 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Abraham Lincoln Continuation Public 99 -14%
Peer-group median -17%
Raincross High (continuation) Public 92 -6%
Mission View High Public 90 -39%
Alvord High Public 105 -24%
Leadership Military Academy Public 134 -40%
Nueva Vista Continuation High Public 210 +1%
Dr. John H. Milor High Continuation Public 192 -11%
Slover Mountain High (continuation) Public 223 -22%
Audeo Valley Charter School Public 192 -48%
Orangewood High (continuation) Public 205 -10%
Mojave River Academy - Gold Canyon Public 227 +100%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →