Able Charter
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Stagg Senior High → Weston Ranch High School → Ronald E Mcnair High School → Aspire Langston Hughes Academy → One.charter → Compare all similar →Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+5.3%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~1,218 | +61 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~1,349 | +192 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~1,495 | +338 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Joaquin County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Families who enroll at Able Charter stay (92.9% stability — elite). But enrollment is dropping faster than San Joaquin County (school +18.2% vs. county +21.8%). The audit question isn't why students leave — it's why fewer families are choosing to enroll in the first place.
26 of 365 students who enrolled at Able Charter this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (7.1% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 3.8 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
District financial profile — New Jerusalem Elementary (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 18.4%
Federal: 6.8%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the New Jerusalem Elementary as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
-1.9 pp vs. peer median (10.2%) · Ranked #5 of 9 similar schools
18.5%
10.2%
53.3%
8.3%
Higher than 13% of California high schools (1105 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Able Charter's UC Reach of 8.3% is below the California median (18.5%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 53.3% or higher.
Overall, Able Charter's UC Reach is higher than 13% of California high schools (1105 ranked).
Able Charter — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · Stockton · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Able Charter sits in the middle of its similar-school group (ranked #5 of 9): 8% vs. a peer median of 10%.
- ▸Its UC Reach has held roughly steady since 2019.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 18% (66→78 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of +5%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+5.3%/yr); projects to ~1349 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Able Charter | Public | 1157 | 8.3% | +18% |
| Peer-group median | 10.2% | +5% | ||
| Stagg Senior High | Public | 1549 | 5.2% | +13% |
| Weston Ranch High School | Public | 1093 | 12.9% | +4% |
| Ronald E Mcnair High School | Public | 1610 | 12.9% | +2% |
| Aspire Langston Hughes Academy | Public | 809 | 28.7% | +36% |
| One.charter | Public | 1312 | — | +547% |
| Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory Academy | Public | 698 | — | +129% |
| Bear Creek High School | Public | 1977 | 14.2% | +2% |
| Cesar Chavez High School | Public | 2052 | 7.5% | -6% |
| Venture Academy | Public | 1656 | 4.0% | -6% |
| Franklin High | Public | 1958 | 6.7% | +6% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Admit rate vs. CA peer average, by campus ⓘ
How does this school's admit rate at each UC compare to other CA schools whose applicant pool averages the same GPA?
| Campus | Applicant GPA (avg) | Actual admit rate | CA peer avg | Δ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Davis | 3.77 | 40.0% | 32.0% | +8.0pp | Over |
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.68 | — |
| UCLA → Elite | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.80 | — |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.81 | — |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.60 | — |
| UC Davis → | 15 | 6 | — | 40.0% | 8.3% | — | 3.77 | 4.05 |