LEXINGTON HIGH
LEXINGTON · MO · LEXINGTON R-V · Public
Similar nearby schools
Most similar nearby schools
LEX LA-RAY TECHNICAL CTR. → WELLINGTON-NAPOLEON HIGH → HARDIN-CENTRAL HIGH → RICHMOND HIGH → ROLLING MEADOW SCHOOL → LAFAYETTE CO. HIGH → NORBORNE HIGH → ODESSA HIGH →📋 At a glance
- ✅ Dual-enrollment program (college credit while in HS)
- 🎓 AP rigor: Bottom 33% of US high schools
- 📝 SAT/ACT participation: Bottom 40% by test-taker volume
- 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 97% (90th percentile nationally)
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How LEXINGTON HIGH compares for families
What families should know about LEXINGTON HIGH.
- ▸ LocallyMO sits right at the US average on NAEP 8th-grade math — local school quality will set your kid apart.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: LEX LA-RAY TECHNICAL CTR., WELLINGTON-NAPOLEON HIGH, HARDIN-CENTRAL HIGH and 5 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.
Follow LEXINGTON HIGH
Get an email when LEXINGTON HIGH's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.
SAT / ACT participation
CRDC federal data · 2020-21Bottom 40% by test-taker volume
Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.
🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts
What % of students graduate on time?
90th percentile nationally
Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.
👩🏫 Teacher workforce · federal CRDC
Teacher experience & reliability
Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2017-18 — the most recent vintage that publishes per-school teacher quality fields; the 2020-21 sweep had them suppressed). "Inexperienced" = teachers in their first or second year. "Chronic absence" = teachers absent 10+ days/year.
🏛️ Federal Title I context
Title I Schoolwide eligible
≥40% FRPL — qualifies for Title I Schoolwide program
40-74% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. The district can use Title I funds across the whole school under federal Schoolwide Program rules.
Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.
Chronic absenteeism
Why this matters to enrollment: Chronic absence is the most reliable early indicator that a student will leave a school — either by transferring out, dropping out, or matriculating to a charter or private alternative. At this level, today's absentees become next year's enrollment loss and the year-after's revenue loss. For school leaders: an Enrollment Trend Audit traces this dynamic forward →
Source: U.S. Department of Education, Civil Rights Data Collection 2020–2021. Rate = students chronically absent ÷ 2024 total enrollment.
Counselor capacity
Source: U.S. Department of Education, Civil Rights Data Collection 2020-2021. Counselor ratio = the school's most recent total enrollment ÷ counselor FTE. The American School Counselor Association (ASCA) recommends a 250:1 maximum; the US national median across schools with on-staff counselors is roughly 430:1.
Enrollment trend & projection
Total enrollment + grade 12, NCES Common Core of Data (2021–2024).
If the recent trend holds…
At its recent rate of +0.1%/year, projecting from 2024's 310 students:
An extrapolation of the recent trajectory, not a forecast of the school's plans; ignores one-off shocks.
Revenue upside
At $15,277 per student in district revenue, the 2 students projected to be gained by 2029 represent ≈ $30,554/year in additional funding.
District total revenue ÷ enrollment, NCES F-33. Public funding largely follows enrollment, so a shrinking class is a recurring budget hit.
Nearby high schools — the local competition
The closest high schools families here also consider, and where their enrollment is heading.
| School | Type | Miles | HS enrollment | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEX LA-RAY TECHNICAL CTR. LEXINGTON |
Public | 0.1 | — | — |
| WELLINGTON-NAPOLEON HIGH WELLINGTON |
Public | 6.8 | 116 | -10.8% |
| HARDIN-CENTRAL HIGH HARDIN |
Public | 7.0 | 67 | -4.3% |
| RICHMOND HIGH RICHMOND |
Public | 8.5 | 474 | +7.0% |
| ROLLING MEADOW SCHOOL HIGGINSVILLE |
Public | 10.4 | 4 | — |
| LAFAYETTE CO. HIGH HIGGINSVILLE |
Public | 10.6 | 298 | -2.9% |
| NORBORNE HIGH NORBORNE |
Public | 13.6 | 48 | — |
| ODESSA HIGH ODESSA |
Public | 13.7 | 651 | +7.4% |