William Tell Aggeler Opportunity High

· Los Angeles County · Los Angeles Unified
Public Los Angeles County 🏛 Los Angeles Unified → CDS 1964733…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Henry David Thoreau Continuation → Owensmouth Continuation → Albert Einstein Continuation → Jane Addams Continuation → Zane Grey Continuation → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for William Tell Aggeler Opportunity High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
92 (2018)45 (2026)
-51.1%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
14 (2018)8 (2026)
-42.9%

If this trend holds (-8.6%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~41 -4 $0
3 yr (2029) ~34 -11 $0
5 yr (2031) ~29 -16 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -42.9% vs. county -8.2% AND stability (16.0%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 76.3% (up -6.0 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-42.9%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-8.2%  Los Angeles County baseline
-34.7pp  gap vs. county
16.0%  retention (county median 87.3%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
16.0%
17 of 106 students

89 of 106 students who enrolled at William Tell Aggeler Opportunity High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (84.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Los Angeles County median
87.3% · school is in the 3rd percentile of 387 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 1st percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (101) 16.8%
Hispanic / Latino (94) 18.1%
Students w/ disabilities (45) 13.3%

Nearest peer high schools

Henry David Thoreau Continuation 8.0% Owensmouth Continuation 16.9% Albert Einstein Continuation 14.7% Jane Addams Continuation 13.7% Zane Grey Continuation 33.1%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
76.9%
70 of 91 students

Absenteeism is down 5.4 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Los Angeles County median
25.2% · school is worse than 94% of 381 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 16
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-58.0 pts vs. Los Angeles County median (58.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 15
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-25.0 pts vs. Los Angeles County median (25.0%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 89%
Black / African Am. 7% +5.1
White 4%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 64% -1.2

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Los Angeles Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$11112.5M
+8.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$24,124
460,633 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 51.7%
Local: 29.8%
Federal: 18.5%
Instruction share
53.5%
of current spending · $10,061/pupil
Long-term debt
$11908.4M
+4.3% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Los Angeles Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

William Tell Aggeler Opportunity High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 43% (14→8 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -28%.
  • At its recent rate (-8.6%/yr), enrollment projects to ~34 by 2029 — about 11 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

45 students (2026)
~34 projected (2029)
at -8.6%/yr

That's about 11 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
William Tell Aggeler Opportunity High Public 45 -43%
Peer-group median -28%
Henry David Thoreau Continuation Public 45 -76%
Owensmouth Continuation Public 60 -23%
Albert Einstein Continuation Public 52 +80%
Jane Addams Continuation Public 56 -76%
Zane Grey Continuation Public 61 -21%
John R. Wooden High Public 69 -25%
Evergreen Continuation Public 57 -30%
Independence Continuation Public 79 +12%
Stoney Point Continuation Public 105 -56%
Apollo High Public 76 -63%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →