No UC admissions data on file for Vail High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
367 (2018)204 (2026)
-44.4%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
297 (2018)141 (2026)
-52.5%

If this trend holds (-7.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~190 -14 $0
3 yr (2029) ~164 -40 $0
5 yr (2031) ~141 -63 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -52.5% vs. county -8.2% AND stability (45.1%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 68.8% (up +60.6 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-52.5%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-8.2%  Los Angeles County baseline
-44.3pp  gap vs. county
45.1%  retention (county median 87.3%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
45.1%
133 of 295 students

162 of 295 students who enrolled at Vail High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (54.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Los Angeles County median
87.3% · school is in the 14th percentile of 387 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 15th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (292) 45.2%
Socio. disadvantaged (273) 46.5%
English learners (77) 49.4%
Students w/ disabilities (23) 39.1%

Nearest peer high schools

Esteban Torres East La Performing Arts Magnet 82.1% Ruben Salazar Continuation 47.1% Engineering And Technology Academy At Esteban E. Torres High No. 3 82.2% Applied Technology Center 86.6%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
68.8%
198 of 288 students

Absenteeism is up 60.6 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Los Angeles County median
25.2% · school is worse than 88% of 381 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 85
10.6%
incl. 2.4% exceeded
-47.4 pts vs. Los Angeles County median (58.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 86
1.2%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-23.8 pts vs. Los Angeles County median (25.0%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 100%
Asian 0%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 97% +11.7
English learners 22% -4.1
Socioeconomically disadv. 9%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Montebello Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$449.6M
+4.2% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$19,471
23,092 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 60.9%
Local: 22.1%
Federal: 17.0%
Instruction share
58.7%
of current spending · $10,803/pupil
Long-term debt
$198.5M
-16.6% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Montebello Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Vail High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 52% (297→141 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -17%.
  • At its recent rate (-7.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~164 by 2029 — about 40 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

204 students (2026)
~164 projected (2029)
at -7.1%/yr

That's about 40 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Vail High (continuation) Public 204 -52%
Peer-group median 24.1% -17%
Esteban Torres East La Performing Arts Magnet Public 186 -36%
Ruben Salazar Continuation Public 168 -16%
Engineering And Technology Academy At Esteban E. Torres High No. 3 Public 235 -18%
Hilda L. Solis Learning Academy School Of Technology, Business And Education Public 170 -46%
Applied Technology Center Public 288 24.1% -37%
Vista High Public 170 -2%
Sierra Vista High (alternative) Public 264 -34%
Frontier High (continuation) Public 304 +7%
East Los Angeles Renaissance Academy At Esteban E. Torres High No. 2 Public 326 -11%
Columbus (christopher) High Public 322 +32%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →