Southern Trinity High
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Casterlin High → Valley High → Mt. Lassic High (continuation) → Whale Gulch High → Mattole Triple Junction Hs → Compare all similar →No UC admissions data on file for Southern Trinity High.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (-9.1%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~6 | -1 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~5 | -2 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~4 | -3 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Trinity County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Southern Trinity High's enrollment is shrinking 5.0× the county rate (school -75.0% vs. county -14.9%). Stability of 71.4% means every family you keep is one fewer; the leverage is at recruitment, not retention. This is the case the high stability number alone would hide.
2 of 7 students who enrolled at Southern Trinity High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (28.6% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2023-24
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is down 20.8 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2023-24. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
District financial profile — Southern Trinity Joint Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 39.0%
Federal: 10.7%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Southern Trinity Joint Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
Southern Trinity High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is down 75% (4→1 from 2019 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -40%.
- ▸At its recent rate (-9.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~5 by 2029 — about 2 fewer students than today.
Enrollment projection
That's about 2 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.
Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southern Trinity High | Public | 7 | — | -75% |
| Peer-group median | — | -40% | ||
| Casterlin High | Public | 5 | — | +0% |
| Valley High | Public | 11 | — | -40% |
| Mt. Lassic High (continuation) | Public | 1 | — | -50% |
| Whale Gulch High | Public | 7 | — | -50% |
| Mattole Triple Junction Hs | Public | 5 | — | +0% |
| Round Valley Continuation | Public | 12 | — | -50% |
| Leggett Valley High | Public | 13 | — | +50% |
| Tehama Oaks High | Public | 13 | — | -67% |
| Northern Summit Academy | Public | 3 | — | — |
| Alps View High (continuation) | Public | 20 | — | +200% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →