No UC admissions data on file for Puc Excel Charter Academy.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
309 (2018)217 (2026)
-29.8%

If this trend holds (-4.3%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~208 -9 $0
3 yr (2029) ~190 -27 $0
5 yr (2031) ~174 -43 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
85.4%
240 of 281 students

41 of 281 students who enrolled at Puc Excel Charter Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (14.6% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Los Angeles County median
89.1% · school is in the 33rd percentile of 676 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 36th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (266) 85.7%
Socio. disadvantaged (258) 86.0%
Students w/ disabilities (52) 78.8%
English learners (40) 67.5%

Nearest peer high schools

Los Angeles Leadership Primary Academy 89.4% Alliance Susan And Eric Smidt Technology High 82.9% Glassell Park Es Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts And Math Magnet 93.0% Engineering And Technology Academy At Esteban E. Torres High No. 3 82.2% Puc Milagro Charter 93.2%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
26.5%
73 of 275 students

Absenteeism is up 12.4 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Los Angeles County median
22.7% · school is worse than 61% of 669 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Los Angeles Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$11112.5M
+8.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$24,124
460,633 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 51.7%
Local: 29.8%
Federal: 18.5%
Instruction share
53.5%
of current spending · $10,061/pupil
Long-term debt
$11908.4M
+4.3% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Los Angeles Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Puc Excel Charter Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-4.3%/yr), enrollment projects to ~190 by 2029 — about 27 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

217 students (2026)
~190 projected (2029)
at -4.3%/yr

That's about 27 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Puc Excel Charter Academy Public 217
Peer-group median -31%
Los Angeles Leadership Primary Academy Public 221
Alliance Susan And Eric Smidt Technology High Public 246 -44%
Glassell Park Es Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts And Math Magnet Public 208
Engineering And Technology Academy At Esteban E. Torres High No. 3 Public 235 -18%
Puc Milagro Charter Public 271
Los Angeles Academy Of Arts And Enterprise Public 193 -40%
Anahuacalmecac International University Preparatory Of North America Public 244 +6%
Esteban Torres East La Performing Arts Magnet Public 186 -36%
Alliance Tennenbaum Family Technology High Public 174 -26%
Puente Charter Public 305

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →