Montecito High (continuation)

· San Diego County · Ramona City Unified
Public San Diego County 🏛 Ramona City Unified → CDS 3768304…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Poway To Palomar Middle College High → Mountain Valley Academy → Warner Junior Senior High School → All Tribes Charter → Audeo Charter School Iii → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Montecito High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
150 (2018)93 (2026)
-38.0%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
62 (2018)58 (2026)
-6.5%

If this trend holds (-5.8%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~88 -5 $0
3 yr (2029) ~78 -15 $0
5 yr (2031) ~69 -24 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Diego County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Action needed
Mid-year exits eroding share alongside county-wide pressure.

Tracking San Diego County on enrollment (-6.5% vs. -7.8%), but stability (51.2%) is below the county median. Retention is the levered fix. Chronic absenteeism is also at 66.9% (up -10.1 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-6.5%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-7.8%  San Diego County baseline
+1.3pp  gap vs. county
51.2%  retention (county median 88.5%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
51.2%
63 of 123 students

60 of 123 students who enrolled at Montecito High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (48.8% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Diego County median
88.5% · school is in the 14th percentile of 121 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 17th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (97) 49.5%
Hispanic / Latino (70) 51.4%
White (43) 48.8%
Students w/ disabilities (23) 60.9%
English learners (22) 54.5%

Nearest peer high schools

Poway To Palomar Middle College High 89.4% Mountain Valley Academy 76.0% Warner Junior Senior High School 88.4% All Tribes Charter 98.0% Audeo Charter School Iii 42.6%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
66.9%
81 of 121 students

Absenteeism is down 10.1 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

San Diego County median
18.9% · school is worse than 92% of 117 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 48
14.6%
incl. 4.2% exceeded
-46.0 pts vs. San Diego County median (60.6%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 48
2.1%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-22.3 pts vs. San Diego County median (24.4%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 69% +11.1
White 25% -10.4
Two or more 6%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 81% +2.2
Socioeconomically disadv. 13%
English learners 12%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Ramona City Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$69.2M
+8.5% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$13,650
5,070 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 44.9%
Local: 44.5%
Federal: 10.6%
Instruction share
56.3%
of current spending · $7,203/pupil
Long-term debt
$19.4M
-23.1% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Ramona City Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Montecito High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 6% (62→58 from 2018 to 2026), tracking the peer-group median of -8%.
  • At its recent rate (-5.8%/yr), enrollment projects to ~78 by 2029 — about 15 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

93 students (2026)
~78 projected (2029)
at -5.8%/yr

That's about 15 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Montecito High (continuation) Public 93 -6%
Peer-group median 23.9% -8%
Poway To Palomar Middle College High Public 96 23.9% +32%
Mountain Valley Academy Public 174 -48%
Warner Junior Senior High School Public 93 -17%
All Tribes Charter Public 113 -26%
Audeo Charter School Iii Public 148 -15%
Merit Academy Public 72 +0%
Julian High Public 132 +14%
Idea Center High School Public 129 -25%
Oak Glen High Public 73 +12%
Dimensions Collaborative Schl Public 147 +28%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →