Live Oak High School
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Gridley High School → Sutter Peak Charter Academy → Sutter High School → Marysville High School → Oroville High School → Compare all similar →Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+1.3%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~606 | +8 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~621 | +23 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~637 | +39 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Sutter County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Live Oak High School is recruiting families faster than Sutter County is shrinking (school +19.8% vs. county -1.2%), but 75 students didn't make it to year-end. The recruitment engine works; the mid-year exits are worth understanding.
75 of 641 students who enrolled at Live Oak High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (11.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 7.8 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
District financial profile — Live Oak Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 21.2%
Federal: 15.7%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Live Oak Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
+28.5 pp above peer median (4.4%) · Ranked #1 of 6 similar schools
18.5%
4.4%
53.3%
32.9%
Higher than 76% of California high schools (1105 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Live Oak High School's UC Reach of 32.9% is in the top quartile statewide (median 18.5%; top 25% bar 32.0%) — but it's still below the top-10% bar of 53.3%.
Against similar schools, Live Oak High School stands out clearly — the peer-group median is 4.4%.
For context, the elite tier (top 1%) clears 102.7% — a gap of 70 pp from where this school sits.
Overall, Live Oak High School's UC Reach is higher than 76% of California high schools (1105 ranked).
Live Oak High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · Live Oak · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Live Oak High School sits near the top of its similar-school group (ranked #1 of 6): 33% vs. a peer median of 4%.
- ▸Its UC Reach has risen 6 points since 2018.
- ▸Across the top-6 UC campuses, Live Oak High School is admitting at roughly +6 percentage points above what its average applicant GPA (3.776) alone would predict (26% actual vs. 20% expected). That's a meaningful signal — it can reflect UC's track record with this school's graduates, students presenting strongly in UC's holistic review (essays, EC's, context), or institutional familiarity helping at the margin. The data can't distinguish which, but the pattern itself is real and worth understanding.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 20% (121→145 from 2018 to 2026), tracking the peer-group median of +19%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+1.3%/yr); projects to ~621 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Live Oak High School | Public | 598 | 32.9% | +20% |
| Peer-group median | 4.4% | +19% | ||
| Gridley High School | Public | 685 | 2.8% | +36% |
| Sutter Peak Charter Academy | Public | 804 | — | +115% |
| Sutter High School | Public | 733 | 4.4% | -13% |
| Marysville High School | Public | 972 | 5.8% | +26% |
| Oroville High School | Public | 830 | 5.0% | -6% |
| Colusa High School | Public | 413 | 2.8% | +31% |
| Williams Junior/Senior High | Public | 591 | — | +12% |
| Marysville Charter Academy For The Arts | Public | 378 | — | +26% |
| Yuba City Charter | Public | 246 | — | -44% |
| Yuba County Career Preparatory Charter | Public | 217 | — | -66% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Admit rate vs. CA peer average, by campus ⓘ
How does this school's admit rate at each UC compare to other CA schools whose applicant pool averages the same GPA?
| Campus | Applicant GPA (avg) | Actual admit rate | CA peer avg | Δ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | 3.61 | 19.4% | 15.0% | +4.4pp | On target |
| UCLA | 3.77 | 16.7% | 9.1% | +7.6pp | Over |
| UC San Diego | 3.83 | 27.3% | 24.0% | +3.3pp | On target |
| UC Davis | 3.87 | 39.0% | 32.2% | +6.9pp | Over |
Where Live Oak High School sits vs. all California schools ⓘ
Overall, this school admits its UC applicants 5.6 points above what their GPAs predict (26.0% actual vs. 20.4% expected).
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 36 | 7 | 5 | 19.4% | 4.9% | 71.4% | 3.61 | — |
| UCLA → Elite | 36 | 6 | 3 | 16.7% | 4.2% | 50.0% | 3.77 | — |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 33 | 9 | 3 | 27.3% | 6.3% | 33.3% | 3.83 | — |
| UC Santa Barbara → Selective | 36 | 9 | — | 25.0% | 6.3% | — | — | — |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.72 | — |
| UC Davis → | 41 | 16 | 3 | 39.0% | 11.2% | 18.8% | 3.87 | 4.11 |