Ilead Lancaster Charter
📄 Shareable scorecard →No UC admissions data on file for Ilead Lancaster Charter.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+1.1%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~778 | +8 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~795 | +25 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~813 | +43 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
131 of 843 students who enrolled at Ilead Lancaster Charter this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (15.5% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.
Absenteeism is up 18.0 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Ilead Lancaster Charter — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+1.1%/yr); projects to ~795 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilead Lancaster Charter | Public | 770 | — | — |
| Peer-group median | — | -38% | ||
| Soar High (students On Academic Rise) | Public | 720 | — | +60% |
| Desert Sands Charter | Public | 604 | — | -63% |
| David G. Millen Law And Government Magnet Academy | Public | 856 | — | — |
| Cactus Medical, Health And Technology Magnet Academy | Public | 786 | — | — |
| Space Aeronautics Gateway To Exploration Magnet Academy | Public | 715 | — | — |
| Gregg Anderson Academy | Public | 883 | — | — |
| Desert Willow Fine Arts, Science And Technology Magnet Academy | Public | 826 | — | — |
| Shadow Hills Engineering And Design Magnet Academy | Public | 806 | — | — |
| Antelope Valley Learning Academy | Public | 911 | — | -56% |
| Desert Winds Continuation High | Public | 468 | — | -20% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →