Healdsburg Junior High

· Sonoma County · Healdsburg Unified
Public Sonoma County 🏛 Healdsburg Unified → CDS 4975390…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Healdsburg High School → Ridgway High (continuation) → Sunridge Charter → Olivet Elementary Charter → Morrice Schaefer Charter → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Healdsburg Junior High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
357 (2018)263 (2026)
-26.3%

If this trend holds (-3.7%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~253 -10 $0
3 yr (2029) ~235 -28 $0
5 yr (2031) ~217 -46 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Sonoma County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
96.3%
290 of 301 students

11 of 301 students who enrolled at Healdsburg Junior High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (3.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Sonoma County median
92.0% · school is in the 88th percentile of 59 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 93rd percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (210) 96.2%
Hispanic / Latino (195) 96.9%
White (93) 95.7%
Students w/ disabilities (46) 100.0%
English learners (38) 89.5%

Nearest peer high schools

Healdsburg High School 93.8% Ridgway High (continuation) 44.1% Sunridge Charter 96.2% Olivet Elementary Charter 90.4% Morrice Schaefer Charter 90.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
20.9%
63 of 301 students

Absenteeism is up 12.9 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Sonoma County median
17.5% · school is worse than 60% of 58 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Healdsburg Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$39.3M
+18.3% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$29,827
1,317 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 12.2%
Local: 81.5%
Federal: 6.3%
Instruction share
53.3%
of current spending · $12,131/pupil
Long-term debt
$140.9M
+55.0% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Healdsburg Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Healdsburg Junior High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-3.7%/yr), enrollment projects to ~235 by 2029 — about 28 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

263 students (2026)
~235 projected (2029)
at -3.7%/yr

That's about 28 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Healdsburg Junior High Public 263
Peer-group median 40.3% -12%
Healdsburg High School Public 510 40.3% -20%
Ridgway High (continuation) Public 252 -4%
Sunridge Charter Public 263
Olivet Elementary Charter Public 328
Morrice Schaefer Charter Public 318
Piner-Olivet Charter Public 204
Sebastopol Independent Charter Public 282
Twin Hills Charter Middle Public 252
Wright Charter Public 342
Forestville Academy Public 160

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →