Citrus High (continuation)

· San Bernardino County · Fontana Unified
Public San Bernardino County 🏛 Fontana Unified → CDS 3667710…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Entrepreneur High Fontana → Eric Birch High (continuation) → Gateway College And Career Academy → Mojave River Academy - Gold Canyon → Valley View High (continuation) → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Citrus High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
307 (2018)335 (2025)
+9.1%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
224 (2018)232 (2025)
+3.6%

If this trend holds (+1.3%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2026) ~339 +4 $0
3 yr (2028) ~348 +13 $0
5 yr (2030) ~357 +22 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Bernardino County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Action needed
Mid-year exits eroding share alongside county-wide pressure.

Tracking San Bernardino County on enrollment (+3.6% vs. +3.9%), but stability (53.0%) is below the county median. Retention is the levered fix. Chronic absenteeism is also at 57.3% (up +3.3 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

+3.6%  school enrollment (2018–2025)
+3.9%  San Bernardino County baseline
-0.3pp  gap vs. county
53.0%  retention (county median 80.5%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
53.0%
245 of 462 students

217 of 462 students who enrolled at Citrus High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (47.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Bernardino County median
80.5% · school is in the 25th percentile of 99 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 19th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (421) 53.0%
Socio. disadvantaged (420) 52.9%
English learners (173) 54.9%
Students w/ disabilities (82) 73.2%

Nearest peer high schools

Entrepreneur High Fontana 73.9% Eric Birch High (continuation) 47.4% Gateway College And Career Academy 56.0% Mojave River Academy - Gold Canyon 61.0% Valley View High (continuation) 33.3%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
57.3%
252 of 440 students

Absenteeism is up 3.3 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

San Bernardino County median
26.7% · school is worse than 84% of 97 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 132
3.8%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-42.5 pts vs. San Bernardino County median (46.3%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 132
1.5%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-14.3 pts vs. San Bernardino County median (15.8%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2024-25

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 92% +1.3
White 3%
Black / African Am. 3% -1.6
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 92% -5.0
English learners 38% +4.2
Socioeconomically disadv. 18% -1.3
Homeless 4%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2024-25 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Fontana Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$722.1M
+28.1% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$20,363
35,461 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 62.7%
Local: 13.3%
Federal: 24.0%
Instruction share
55.2%
of current spending · $9,081/pupil
Long-term debt
$233.8M
-6.8% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Fontana Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Citrus High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 4% (224→232 from 2018 to 2025), outpacing the peer-group median of -12%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+1.3%/yr); projects to ~348 by 2028.

Enrollment projection

335 students (2025)
~348 projected (2028)
at +1.3%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Citrus High (continuation) Public 335 +4%
Peer-group median 81.4% -12%
Entrepreneur High Fontana Public 393 -2%
Eric Birch High (continuation) Public 469 +83%
Gateway College And Career Academy Public 395 -11%
Mojave River Academy - Gold Canyon Public 227 +100%
Valley View High (continuation) Public 363 -12%
Slover Mountain High (continuation) Public 223 -22%
Asa Charter Public 350 -46%
Middle College High Public 277 81.4% -12%
Nueva Vista Continuation High Public 210 +1%
Cbk Charter Public 485 -84%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →