Ceiba College Preparatory Academy

· Santa Cruz County · Pajaro Valley Unified
Public Santa Cruz County 🏛 Pajaro Valley Unified → CDS 4469799…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Santa Cruz County Career Advancement Charter → Pacific Collegiate Charter → Scotts Valley High School → Dr. Tj Owens Gilroy Early College Academy → Pajaro Valley Hs → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Ceiba College Preparatory Academy.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
513 (2018)494 (2026)
-3.7%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
65 (2018)48 (2026)
-26.2%

If this trend holds (-0.5%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~492 -2 $0
3 yr (2029) ~487 -7 $0
5 yr (2031) ~482 -12 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Santa Cruz County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Material decline in demand.

Enrollment -26.2% vs. county +3.1% — losing 8.5× the county rate. Each enrolled family matters more, but the engine of new enrollment is breaking down.

-26.2%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+3.1%  Santa Cruz County baseline
-29.3pp  gap vs. county
92.5%  retention (county median 90.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
92.5%
234 of 253 students

19 of 253 students who enrolled at Ceiba College Preparatory Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (7.5% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Santa Cruz County median
90.8% · school is in the 73rd percentile of 15 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 78th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (502) 93.4%
Socio. disadvantaged (415) 93.0%
English learners (181) 93.4%
Students w/ disabilities (51) 96.1%

Nearest peer high schools

Santa Cruz County Career Advancement Charter 20.0% Pacific Collegiate Charter 92.9% Scotts Valley High School 96.3% Dr. Tj Owens Gilroy Early College Academy 97.7% Pajaro Valley Hs 88.7%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
15.1%
38 of 251 students

Absenteeism is down 34.9 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Santa Cruz County median
18.8% · school is better than 71% of 14 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 49
71.4%
incl. 36.7% exceeded
+5.3 pts above Santa Cruz County median (66.1%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 49
36.7%
incl. 18.4% exceeded
+2.5 pts above Santa Cruz County median (34.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 98%
White 2%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 78%
English learners 18% +1.6

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Pajaro Valley Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$341.2M
+16.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$18,204
18,743 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 54.9%
Local: 28.7%
Federal: 16.4%
Instruction share
52.9%
of current spending · $8,526/pupil
Long-term debt
$203.6M
+2.5% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Pajaro Valley Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Ceiba College Preparatory Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 26% (65→48 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -5%.
  • At its recent rate (-0.5%/yr), enrollment projects to ~487 by 2029 — about 7 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

494 students (2026)
~487 projected (2029)
at -0.5%/yr

That's about 7 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Ceiba College Preparatory Academy Public 494 -26%
Peer-group median 21.8% -5%
Santa Cruz County Career Advancement Charter Public 235 +390%
Pacific Collegiate Charter Public 551 -14%
Scotts Valley High School Public 592 44.7% -10%
Dr. Tj Owens Gilroy Early College Academy Public 308 +22%
Pajaro Valley Hs Public 1270 10.9% -4%
San Lorenzo Valley High School Public 537 22.1% -26%
Pacific Grove High School Public 539 39.8% -5%
Anzar High School Public 260 4.5% -41%
Marina High Public 777 9.2% +43%
North Monterey County High Sch Public 1169 21.8% +14%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →